Can you answer any of these questions posed by other users? Think of it as a civic good deed. See 4 more questions posed on this topic or submit your own question on the Q&A page.

Answered by a visitor on Apr 29, 2009 10:31 PM - I don't understand what the previous response has to do with the bill at all. But to answer the question, no it would not limit clergy or any citizen from speaking against homosexuals or any other minority group subject to hate crimes. It would be unconstitutional under the first amendment to restrict the freedom of speech, even if it be speech about discrimination and acts of violence. The bill is designed to protect individuals from VIOLENT ACTS of hate, not words of hate.

Answered by a visitor on Apr 30, 2009 9:53 AM - NO. The expression of political or religious beliefs is protected by the First Amendment. The Supreme Court has ruled that "the constitutional guarantees of free speech and free press do not permit a State to forbid or proscribe advocacy of the use of force or of law violation except where such advocacy is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action." Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444 (1969). Clergy are also protected by the First Amendment's free exercise clause. Those who express opposition without advocating violence will not face arrest or prosecution.