| | | | | | |  |
H.R. 6598: | Prevention of Equine Cruelty Act of 2008 | 110th Congress 2007-2008 |
To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit certain conduct relating to the use of horses for human consumption. OverviewSponsor: | | Text: | Summary
|
Full Text | Status: |  | Introduced | Jul 24, 2008 |  | Referred to Committee | View Committee Assignments |  | Reported by Committee | Sep 23, 2008 |  | House Vote | (did not occur) |  | Senate Vote | (did not occur) |  | Signed by President | (did not occur) |
This bill never became law.
This bill was proposed in a previous session of Congress. Sessions
of Congress last two years, and at the end of each session all
proposed bills and resolutions that haven't passed are cleared from the books.
Members often reintroduce bills that did not come up for debate
under a new number in the next session.
| Last Action: | Oct 3, 2008:
House Committee on Agriculture Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than Jan. 3, 2009. | Related: | See the Related Legislation page for other bills related to this one and a list of subject terms
that have been applied to this bill.
Sometimes the text of one bill or resolution is incorporated into another, and in those cases the original bill or resolution, as it would appear here, would seem to be abandoned. |
|
Question & Answer 
Can you answer any of these questions posed by other users? Think of it as a civic good deed.
See 6 more questions posed on this topic or submit your own question on the Q&A page.
Sep 19, 2008 9:41 AM - How come this is not being debated as a public safety issue. Many horses going to slaughter have servere mental problems and are unsafe. with out a way to dispose of these horses they are doped up and sold to new familys to the horse industry where they cause must of the horse related injuries and deaths. -
Read AnswersAnswered by a visitor on Dec 5, 2008 6:49 PM -
I ask you, have you ever seen a horse starve to death? Its horriable, and now with no slaughter plants open, and no where to go with old or otherwise unusable horses they are being turned loose on public or private lands and left to fend for themselves. Rising gas costs of the last year, skyrocketing hay prices, and no way to feed horses. If people want to eat horse meat, let them, if they want to feet it to the dogs let them. When slaughter houses were open in the US the abuse and neglect was significantly lower. The horse industry was thriving, now familys whom have raised quality horses for years are getting out of the horse business because good horses are not worth what they should be. And thats because the market is flooded with unwanted horses. Open the plants. We need regulated horse slaughter in the US so the starvation and neglect will decline again. Answered by a visitor on Feb 6, 2009 10:51 AM -
I am responding to the answer that horses going to slaughter have mental problems. That is not true most horses going to slaughter are physically and mentally sound they are just unwanted or someone cannot afford them. THe statement they are doped up and cause most injuries is also very untrue. I am not sure where this person gets their facts from but take it from a n equine vet tech and owner and has 44 years of experience in the horse industry theses instances are few. Sep 25, 2008 10:44 PM - As I understand the issue, horses are not classified as meat animals so their slaughter is not regulated in regards to how they are killed. Wouldn't it make sense to have them reclassified so the plants could be inspected to insure humane methods of killing them? -
Read AnswersAnswered by a visitor on Dec 4, 2008 9:26 PM -
I am against slaughter in the current form in North America. However, as I believe most people would be, if it were redesigned I would be accepting of the idea of the houses being reopened. The current form in which horses are processed in North America is designed for cattle. A horse mentally and physically is a very different species and reacts to situations very differently then a cow would. There is a video of an European slaughter house on youtube in which the gentlemen calmly leads the horse and shoots them. The horses are calm and relaxed, they wash the blood between each one, they are not slipping and sliding. In short it was handled so well I would allow that man to put down my own personal horses with out second guessing my choice. If our houses handled it the same way I would have been pro slaughter. Unfortunately, it is handled quite the opposite here. Answered by a visitor on Feb 6, 2009 10:17 AM -
I agree with the European slaughter answer. I also know that in Sweden they slaughter horses for human consumption and the way they make sure it is done humanely is the drivers bringing in the horses are the ones held accountable if any horses are sick, injured or stressed. If this happens they are not paid, if you hit people where it hurts (wallets) they will make sure all guidelines are met. Yes horses are very different from cattle and so there should be different guidelines. I am an equine vet tech and have owned and shown horses my whole life and have a rescue. If the general public saw every day what I see from irresponsible horse owners,breeders and trainers they might see the slaughter issue differently. We need to attack this problem where is starts the owners, breeders and trainers. |
Sources of InfluenceMAPLight.org reports that the following organizations
have taken a stance on this bill: | Support | Oppose |
|---|
Animal Welfare Institute Humane Society of the United States The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Veterinarians for Equine Welfare National Black Farmers Association (NBFA) Americans Against Horse Slaughter | American Quarter Horse Association American Association of Equine Practitioners National Cattlemen's Beef Association |
Follow the link to MAPLight.org to see if campaign contributions from employees of these organizations are correlated with how Members of Congress voted on this bill. Because the U.S. Congress posts most legislative information online one legislative day after events occur, GovTrack is usually one legislative day behind. For more information about where this data comes from, see
About GovTrack.us. H.R. 6598--110th Congress: Prevention of Equine Cruelty Act of 2008.
(2008).
In GovTrack.us (database of federal legislation).
Retrieved Feb 10, 2010, from
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h110-6598
"H.R. 6598--110th Congress: Prevention of Equine Cruelty Act of 2008."
GovTrack.us (database of federal legislation).
2008.
Feb 10, 2010
<http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h110-6598>
{{cite web
|url=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h110-6598
|title=H.R. 6598
|accessdate=Feb 10, 2010
|author=110th Congress (2008)
|date=Jul 24, 2008
|work=Legislation
|publisher=GovTrack.us
|quote=Prevention of Equine Cruelty Act of 2008
}} | | | |
| |