| | | | | | |  |
H.R. 20: | Melanie Blocker Stokes Mom's Opportunity to Access Health, Education, Research, and Support for... | 111th Congress 2009-2010 |
To provide for research on, and services for individuals with, postpartum depression and psychosis. OverviewSponsor: | | Text: | Summary
|
Full Text | Cost: | less than
$1
per American in 2009.
 | Status: |  | Introduced | Jan 6, 2009 |  | Referred to Committee | View Committee Assignments |  | Reported by Committee | Mar 4, 2009 |  | Passed House | Mar 30, 2009 |  | Senate Vote | ... |  | Signed by President | ... |
This bill has been passed in the House.
The bill now goes on to be voted on in the Senate.
Keep in mind that debate may be taking place on a companion bill in the
Senate, rather than on this particular bill.
[Last Updated: Nov 13, 2009 10:55AM] | Last Action: | Mar 31, 2009:
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. | Other Titles: | -- Melanie Blocker Stokes Mom's Opportunity to Access Health, Education, Research, and Support for Postpartum Depression Act -- Melanie Blocker Stokes MOTHERS Act | Related: | See the Related Legislation page for other bills related to this one and a list of subject terms
that have been applied to this bill.
Sometimes the text of one bill or resolution is incorporated into another, and in those cases the original bill or resolution, as it would appear here, would seem to be abandoned. | Votes: | Mar 30, 2009:
This bill passed in the House of Representatives by roll call vote.
The vote was held under a suspension of the rules to cut debate
short and pass the bill, needing a two-thirds majority.
This usually occurs for non-controversial legislation.
The totals were 391 Ayes, 8 Nays, 32 Present/Not Voting.
Vote Details.
|
|
Question & Answer 
Can you answer any of these questions posed by other users? Think of it as a civic good deed.
See 1 more question posed on this topic or submit your own question on the Q&A page.
Apr 15, 2009 11:08 AM - I wonder if this will lead to an increase in home and midwife births? How will we regulate those? -
Read AnswersAnswered by a visitor on Apr 27, 2009 8:58 PM -
There is no mention in this bill of specific forms of medical caregivers involved in the treatment of postpartum conditions in new mothers. It is not likely that this bill would have any effect on what kind of medical professional a woman would choose to have attend to her prenatal care and delivery. At present in the United State, an expectant mother might choose to continue to see her general practitioner (for an uncomplicated pregancy), to go to a certified nurse-midwife (again, for an uncomplicated pregnancy, but for women who might seek someone who specializes in the care of pregnant women), or an obstetrician (for a more complicated or high-risk pregnancy or simply for a sense of well-being at being attended to by a doctor who specializes in prenatal care and birth). Certified nurse midwives (CNM) currently perform deliveries both in hospitals and homes across the United States. While the percentage of women who use a midwife for prenatal care and delivery is a small percentage of women giving birth in the United States, and coverage of home births may vary by insurance carrier, certified nurse midwives are highly trained and regulated in the United States and across Europe and many countries around the world. See the American College of Nurse-midwives for more information on training and education of CNMs: http://www.acnm.org/index.cfm. Apr 23, 2009 2:10 AM - Is this the bill that would require new mothers to take a psychological exam before leaving the hospital? -
Read AnswersAnswered by a visitor on Apr 27, 2009 8:48 PM -
There is nothing in the substance of this bill which requires or even suggests that new mothers take a psychological examination. What the bill provides for is research into the etiology and possible treatments of postpartum conditions (i.e., postpartum depression or postpartum psychosis); grants to develop improved screening techniques and/or educational programs for medical staff and new mothers, fathers and other relevant family members; and grants for the development of a public awareness campaign about postpartum conditions, in the effort to improve early diagnosis and treatment among women affected. Answered by a visitor on Jul 17, 2009 11:41 AM -
The bill does not require screening. However, the following section of the bill is troublesome on that point. SEC. 302. REPORT BY THE SECRETARY. (a) Study- The Secretary shall conduct a study on the benefits of screening for postpartum conditions. (b) Report- Not later than 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall complete the study required by subsection (a) and submit a report to the Congress on the results of such study. How can The Secretary report on the benefits of screening unless a certain amount of screening has been conducted and the mothers tracked for a period of time to determine their postpartum mental status? I would expect trial screenings will be conducted, the results analyzed and the report developed. Having women opt out of the trial screenings would skew the results. Either way (mandatory or optional trial screenings), in two years the determination will be made as to whether or not the screening is effective. If it is, I would expect screenings will become part of normal postpartum care. Whether or not it will be mandatory remains to be seen. Having had 5 babies in the last ten years I can vouch for the increase in interest by the state in my mental affairs. So far, everything has been optional, but the tide seems to be turning. This bill opens the door pretty wide. |
Because the U.S. Congress posts most legislative information online one legislative day after events occur, GovTrack is usually one legislative day behind. For more information about where this data comes from, see
About GovTrack.us. H.R. 20--111th Congress: Melanie Blocker Stokes Mom's Opportunity to Access Health, Education, Research, and Support for....
(2009).
In GovTrack.us (database of federal legislation).
Retrieved Nov 22, 2009, from
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h111-20
"H.R. 20--111th Congress: Melanie Blocker Stokes Mom's Opportunity to Access Health, Education, Research, and Support for...."
GovTrack.us (database of federal legislation).
2009.
Nov 22, 2009
<http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h111-20>
{{cite web
|url=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h111-20
|title=H.R. 20
|accessdate=Nov 22, 2009
|author=111th Congress (2009)
|date=Jan 6, 2009
|work=Legislation
|publisher=GovTrack.us
|quote=Melanie Blocker Stokes Mom's Opportunity to Access Health, Education, Research, and Support for...
}} | | | |
| |