| | | | | | |  |
H.R. 2267: | Internet Gambling Regulation, Consumer Protection, and Enforcement Act | 111th Congress 2009-2010 |
To amend title 31, United States Code, to provide for the licensing of Internet gambling activities by the Secretary of the Treasury, to provide for consumer protections on the Internet, to enforce the tax code, and for other purposes. OverviewSponsor: | | Text: | Summary
|
Full Text | Status: |  | Introduced | May 6, 2009 |  | Referred to Committee | View Committee Assignments |  | Reported by Committee | ... |  | House Vote | ... |  | Senate Vote | ... |  | Signed by President | ... |
This bill is in the first step in the legislative process. Introduced
bills and resolutions first go to committees that deliberate, investigate, and revise
them before they go to general debate. The majority of bills and resolutions never make it out of committee.
[Last Updated: Nov 17, 2009 6:23AM] | Last Action: | Jun 12, 2009:
House Judiciary: Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security. | Related: | See the Related Legislation page for other bills related to this one and a list of subject terms
that have been applied to this bill.
Sometimes the text of one bill or resolution is incorporated into another, and in those cases the original bill or resolution, as it would appear here, would seem to be abandoned. |
|
Question & Answer 
Can you answer any of these questions posed by other users? Think of it as a civic good deed.
See 2 more questions posed on this topic or submit your own question on the Q&A page.
Jun 29, 2009 8:31 PM - Why does this bill discriminate against sports bettors? -
Read AnswersAnswered by a visitor on Jul 22, 2009 1:29 PM -
Sports betting has its own set of problem - The Wire Act makes most aspects of interstate sports betting illegal at the federal level. Sports betting was part of this bill in its prior incarnation; its removal reflects Frank's acknowledgment that its inclusion will ensure that HR2267 won't pass. Answered by a visitor on Jul 22, 2009 5:58 PM -
are you serious? Is betting and gambling differnt? All that matter is we have the right to do things that don't hurt anybody with out the government sticking there nose in... way past due to to act on the bill of rights section where it says the people can abolish the governemnt when they get like this Sep 9, 2009 9:20 AM - Who decides if a state wants to opt out? -
Read AnswersAnswered by a visitor on Nov 19, 2009 4:06 AM -
It is not clear from the bill text who has the authority at the state level to decide to opt out. The bill specifies that the opt out would be executed by letter from the state governor. However, this does not necessarily imbue the governor with the authority to make the decision. More likely it will depend on each state's laws and constitution, whether this power belongs to the governor or the state legislature. However, there may be clarification of this point in the wording of the bill during the Congressional committee work on it. |
Because the U.S. Congress posts most legislative information online one legislative day after events occur, GovTrack is usually one legislative day behind. For more information about where this data comes from, see
About GovTrack.us. H.R. 2267--111th Congress: Internet Gambling Regulation, Consumer Protection, and Enforcement Act.
(2009).
In GovTrack.us (database of federal legislation).
Retrieved Nov 21, 2009, from
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h111-2267
"H.R. 2267--111th Congress: Internet Gambling Regulation, Consumer Protection, and Enforcement Act."
GovTrack.us (database of federal legislation).
2009.
Nov 21, 2009
<http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h111-2267>
{{cite web
|url=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h111-2267
|title=H.R. 2267
|accessdate=Nov 21, 2009
|author=111th Congress (2009)
|date=May 6, 2009
|work=Legislation
|publisher=GovTrack.us
|quote=Internet Gambling Regulation, Consumer Protection, and Enforcement Act
}} | | | |
| |