Nonnative Wildlife Invasion Prevention Act | |
2009-2010 |
Navigation
|
Track H.R. 669 This feed includes all major activity on this bill and its amendments, references in the Congressional Record, and relevant upcoming committee meetings.
You are not logged in to an account.
Why sign up? Make a widget for this tracker to display on your web page. Make a widget that shows the status of this bill for your webpage. |
 Primary Source See |
To prevent the introduction and establishment of nonnative wildlife species that negatively impact the economy, environment, or other animal species' or human health, and for other purposes.
Overview
|
Question & Answer 
Can you answer any of these questions posed by other users? Think of it as a civic good deed.
See 27 more questions posed on this topic or submit your own question on the Q&A page.
Aug 11, 2009 9:44 AM - If the government is supposed to help us, then why are they wasting their time and our obvious tax money on researching every single animal not native to the U.S. that could only harm a few to no states, causing a total ban on them, where thousands will lose work and worsening the economy even more? -
Read Answers Dec 16, 2009 12:54 PM - Where is the proof these animals pose a sinifigant threat to health? -
Answer it!
and 27 more questions.
|
Sources of Influence
MAPLight.org reports that the following organizations have taken a stance on this bill:
| Support | Oppose |
|---|---|
National Wildlife Federation Natural Resources Defense Council Nature Conservancy great lakes united natural areas association Union of Concerned Scientists Humane Society of the United States | Pet Industry Joint Advisory Council American Pet Products Manufacturers Assocation American Federation of Aviculture (Kansas City, Missouri) |
Follow the link to MAPLight.org to see if campaign contributions from employees of these organizations are correlated with how Members of Congress voted on this bill.
