H.Res. 561 (100th): A resolution directing the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct to conduct an investigation regarding a possible unauthorized disclosure of classified information in violation of the Rules of the House of Representatives.

Introduced:
Sep 30, 1988 (100th Congress, 1987–1988)
Sponsor:
Rep. Richard Cheney [R-WY0]
Status:
Died (Referred to Committee)

The resolution’s title was written by the resolution’s sponsor. H.Res. stands for House simple resolution.

(About Ads | Go Ad-Free for $5)
Status

This resolution was introduced on September 30, 1988, in a previous session of Congress, but was not enacted.

Progress
Introduced Sep 30, 1988
Cosponsors
5 cosponsors (5R) (show)
Committees

House Rules

The committee chair determines whether a resolution will move past the committee stage.

Summary

No summaries available.

Text

Text not yet available.

Primary Source

View on THOMAS (The Library of Congress)

GovTrack gets most information from THOMAS, which is updated generally one day after events occur. Activity since the last update may not be reflected here.

Citation

Click a format for a citation suggestion:

GovTrack’s Bill Summary

We don’t have a summary available yet.

Library of Congress Summary

The summary below was written by the Congressional Research Service, which is a nonpartisan division of the Library of Congress.

9/30/1988--Introduced.
Directs the House Committee on Standards of Official Conduct to investigate whether public comments made by the Speaker of the House regarding an alleged classified intelligence activity involved an unauthorized disclosure of classified information in violation of House rules or committee rules.

House Republican Conference Summary

The summary below was written by the House Republican Conference, which is the caucus of Republicans in the House of Representatives.

No summary available.

House Democratic Caucus Summary

The House Democratic Caucus does not provide summaries of bills.

So, yes, we display the House Republican Conference’s summaries when available even if we do not have a Democratic summary available. That’s because we feel it is better to give you as much information as possible, even if we cannot provide every viewpoint.

We’ll be looking for a source of summaries from the other side in the meanwhile.