S. 2194 (102nd): A bill to assure a priority to Indian lands in the location of certain facilities.

Introduced:
Feb 05, 1992 (102nd Congress, 1991–1992)
Sponsor:
Sen. Quentin Burdick [D-ND]
Status:
Died (Referred to Committee)

The bill’s title was written by the bill’s sponsor. S. stands for Senate bill.

(About Ads | Advertise Here)
Status

This bill was introduced on February 5, 1992, in a previous session of Congress, but was not enacted.

Progress
Introduced Feb 05, 1992
Referred to Committee Feb 05, 1992
Cosponsors
1 cosponsors (1D) (show)
Committees

Senate Indian Affairs

The committee chair determines whether a bill will move past the committee stage.

Summary

No summaries available.

Text

Text not yet available.

Primary Source

View on THOMAS (The Library of Congress)

GovTrack gets most information from THOMAS, which is updated generally one day after events occur. Activity since the last update may not be reflected here.

Citation

Click a format for a citation suggestion:

GovTrack’s Bill Summary

We don’t have a summary available yet.

Library of Congress Summary

The summary below was written by the Congressional Research Service, which is a nonpartisan division of the Library of Congress.

2/5/1992--Introduced.
Directs the Bureau of Indian Affairs, Department of the Interior, and the Indian Health Service, Department of Health and Human Services, to give priority to locating facilities and projects on Indian lands in all matters involving the reorganization or development of service facilities, or in the establishment of related employment projects to address unemployment conditions in economically depressed areas.

House Republican Conference Summary

The summary below was written by the House Republican Conference, which is the caucus of Republicans in the House of Representatives.

No summary available.

House Democratic Caucus Summary

The House Democratic Caucus does not provide summaries of bills.

So, yes, we display the House Republican Conference’s summaries when available even if we do not have a Democratic summary available. That’s because we feel it is better to give you as much information as possible, even if we cannot provide every viewpoint.

We’ll be looking for a source of summaries from the other side in the meanwhile.