S.Con.Res. 133 (102nd): A concurrent resolution concerning Israel’s recent elections and the upcoming visit by Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin to the United States.

Introduced:
Aug 05, 1992 (102nd Congress, 1991–1992)
Sponsor:
Sen. Daniel Akaka [D-HI]
Status:
Died (Referred to Committee)

The resolution’s title was written by the resolution’s sponsor. S.Con.Res. stands for Senate concurrent resolution.

(About Ads | Go Ad-Free for $5)
Status

This resolution was introduced on August 5, 1992, in a previous session of Congress, but was not enacted.

Progress
Introduced Aug 05, 1992
Cosponsors
31 cosponsors (18D, 13R) (show)
Committees

Senate Foreign Relations

The committee chair determines whether a resolution will move past the committee stage.

Summary

No summaries available.

Text

Text not yet available.

Primary Source

View on THOMAS (The Library of Congress)

GovTrack gets most information from THOMAS, which is updated generally one day after events occur. Activity since the last update may not be reflected here.

Citation

Click a format for a citation suggestion:

GovTrack’s Bill Summary

We don’t have a summary available yet.

Library of Congress Summary

The summary below was written by the Congressional Research Service, which is a nonpartisan division of the Library of Congress.

8/5/1992--Introduced.
Congratulates the citizens of Israel on concluding fair and open democratic elections. Welcomes Prime Minister Rabin to the United States. Applauds his statements and actions encouraging active participation in the search for peace. Calls upon all parties in the region to actively and seriously engage in the peace process.

House Republican Conference Summary

The summary below was written by the House Republican Conference, which is the caucus of Republicans in the House of Representatives.

No summary available.

House Democratic Caucus Summary

The House Democratic Caucus does not provide summaries of bills.

So, yes, we display the House Republican Conference’s summaries when available even if we do not have a Democratic summary available. That’s because we feel it is better to give you as much information as possible, even if we cannot provide every viewpoint.

We’ll be looking for a source of summaries from the other side in the meanwhile.