H.Res. 253 (109th): Raising a question of the privileges of the House.

Introduced:
May 03, 2005 (109th Congress, 2005–2006)
Sponsor:
Rep. John Conyers Jr. [D-MI14]
Status:
Died (Introduced)

The resolution’s title was written by the resolution’s sponsor. H.Res. stands for House simple resolution.

(About Ads | Advertise Here)
Status

This resolution was introduced on May 3, 2005, in a previous session of Congress, but was not enacted.

Progress
Introduced May 03, 2005
Votes

On Motion to Table the Resolution: H RES 253
May 03, 2005 7:19 p.m.
Passed 220/196

Cosponsors
none
Summary

No summaries available.

Text

Read Resolution Text »

Last updated May 03, 2005.
3 pages

Primary Source

View on THOMAS (The Library of Congress)

GovTrack gets most information from THOMAS, which is updated generally one day after events occur. Activity since the last update may not be reflected here.

Citation

Click a format for a citation suggestion:

GovTrack’s Bill Summary

We don’t have a summary available yet.

Library of Congress Summary

The summary below was written by the Congressional Research Service, which is a nonpartisan division of the Library of Congress.

5/3/2005--Introduced.
Declares that the House of Representatives: (1) finds that the Committee on the Judiciary purposefully and deliberately mischaracterized five amendments in House Report 109-51; and (2) directs the Chairman of such Committee to report to the House a supplement to such Report that corrects the record by describing the five amendments with nonargumentative, objective captions.

House Republican Conference Summary

The summary below was written by the House Republican Conference, which is the caucus of Republicans in the House of Representatives.

No summary available.

House Democratic Caucus Summary

The House Democratic Caucus does not provide summaries of bills.

So, yes, we display the House Republican Conference’s summaries when available even if we do not have a Democratic summary available. That’s because we feel it is better to give you as much information as possible, even if we cannot provide every viewpoint.

We’ll be looking for a source of summaries from the other side in the meanwhile.