S.Res. 386 (110th): A resolution to authorize testimony and legal representation in State of Nebraska v. Pamir J. Safi.

Introduced:
Nov 16, 2007 (110th Congress, 2007–2009)
Sponsor:
Sen. Harry Reid [D-NV]
Status:
Agreed To (Simple Resolution)

The resolution’s title was written by the resolution’s sponsor. S.Res. stands for Senate simple resolution.

(About Ads | Advertise Here)
Status

This simple resolution was agreed to on November 16, 2007. That is the end of the legislative process for a simple resolution.

Progress
Introduced Nov 16, 2007
Agreed To (Simple Resolution) Nov 16, 2007
Cosponsors
1 cosponsors (1R) (show)
Summary

No summaries available.

Text

Read Resolution Text »

Last updated Nov 16, 2007.
2 pages

Primary Source

View on THOMAS (The Library of Congress)

GovTrack gets most information from THOMAS, which is updated generally one day after events occur. Activity since the last update may not be reflected here.

Citation

Click a format for a citation suggestion:

GovTrack’s Bill Summary

We don’t have a summary available yet.

Library of Congress Summary

The summary below was written by the Congressional Research Service, which is a nonpartisan division of the Library of Congress.

11/16/2007--Passed Senate without amendment. (This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The summary of that version is repeated here.) Authorizes: (1) Dorothy Anderson and Blayne Garth Glissman, Jr. to testify in the case of State of Nebraska v. Pamir J. Safi, except concerning matters for which a privilege should be asserted; and (2) the Senate Legal Counsel to represent Dorothy Anderson and Blayne Garth Glissman, Jr. in such case.

House Republican Conference Summary

The summary below was written by the House Republican Conference, which is the caucus of Republicans in the House of Representatives.

No summary available.

House Democratic Caucus Summary

The House Democratic Caucus does not provide summaries of bills.

So, yes, we display the House Republican Conference’s summaries when available even if we do not have a Democratic summary available. That’s because we feel it is better to give you as much information as possible, even if we cannot provide every viewpoint.

We’ll be looking for a source of summaries from the other side in the meanwhile.