H.Res. 433 (111th): Recognizing the 40th anniversary of Stonewall.

Introduced:
May 13, 2009 (111th Congress, 2009–2010)
Sponsor:
Rep. Jerrold Nadler [D-NY8]
Status:
Died (Referred to Committee)

The resolution’s title was written by the resolution’s sponsor. H.Res. stands for House simple resolution.

(About Ads | Advertise Here)
Status

This resolution was introduced on May 13, 2009, in a previous session of Congress, but was not enacted.

Progress
Introduced May 13, 2009
Cosponsors
43 cosponsors (43D) (show)
Committees

House Judiciary

The committee chair determines whether a resolution will move past the committee stage.

Summary

No summaries available.

Text

Read Resolution Text »

Last updated May 13, 2009.
4 pages

Primary Source

View on THOMAS (The Library of Congress)

GovTrack gets most information from THOMAS, which is updated generally one day after events occur. Activity since the last update may not be reflected here.

Citation

Click a format for a citation suggestion:

GovTrack’s Bill Summary

We don’t have a summary available yet.

Library of Congress Summary

The summary below was written by the Congressional Research Service, which is a nonpartisan division of the Library of Congress.

5/13/2009--Introduced.
Recognizes the 40th anniversary of the police raid on the Stonewall Inn bar in New York City, New York. Honors those who participated during Stonewall and since that time in the civil rights struggle of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender Americans. Recommits the House of Representatives to protecting and providing equal rights for all Americans, including those who are lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender.

House Republican Conference Summary

The summary below was written by the House Republican Conference, which is the caucus of Republicans in the House of Representatives.

No summary available.

House Democratic Caucus Summary

The House Democratic Caucus does not provide summaries of bills.

So, yes, we display the House Republican Conference’s summaries when available even if we do not have a Democratic summary available. That’s because we feel it is better to give you as much information as possible, even if we cannot provide every viewpoint.

We’ll be looking for a source of summaries from the other side in the meanwhile.