H.R. 3397 (112th): Cabin Fee Act of 2012

Introduced:
Nov 10, 2011 (112th Congress, 2011–2013)
Sponsor:
Rep. Doc Hastings [R-WA4]
Status:
Died (Passed House)
See Instead:
This bill was re-introduced as H.R. 1159 on Mar 14, 2013. See H.R. 1159 for current action on this subject.

The bill’s title was written by the bill’s sponsor. H.R. stands for House of Representatives bill.

GovTrack’s Bill Summary

We don’t have a summary available yet.

Library of Congress Summary

The summary below was written by the Congressional Research Service, which is a nonpartisan division of the Library of Congress.


9/10/2012--Passed House amended.
Cabin Fee Act of 2012 - Directs the Secretary of Agriculture (USDA) to set an annual fee for, and requires the payment of such fee to the United States by, an authorized owner of a privately built and owned recreational cabin located on National Forest System land.
Reduces such fee to $100 annually if access to a cabin is significantly impaired, either by natural causes or governmental actions.
Requires payment of a transfer fee to the United States upon the transfer of a cabin between private parties for consideration.
Requires the Secretary to grant a cabin owner the right to administrative appeal of a cabin fee decision, which may be reviewed by bringing a civil action in U.S. district court.

House Republican Conference Summary

The summary below was written by the House Republican Conference, which is the caucus of Republicans in the House of Representatives.


This summary can be found at http://www.gop.gov/bill/112/2/hr3397.

Background

According the Natural Resources Committee, a summer cabin program has existed in National Forests for almost a century, but recent changes in the way permit fees are set for these cabins will put them beyond the reach of many cabin owners. The current system for setting fees for ownership of cabins on National Forest land does not accurately reflect the value of the limited use-permits and the fees often go far beyond what average families can afford, forcing many cabin owners to sell or abandon their cabins. Appraisals completed recently under the current Cabin User Fee Fairness Act (CUFFA) indicate 45 percent of owners have seen fee increases of 200 percent or higher, 20 percent exceed $5,000, 8.5 percent exceed $7,000 and 3.7 percent exceed $10,000. The Cabin Fee Act requires the assignment of each permitted lot to one of nine fee tiers, based on the rank order of current appraised values. The lowest 8 percent of appraised lot values are assigned to the $500 tier. The highest 4 percent are assigned to the $4,500 tier. Following this process, user fee revenue is projected to be about $30 million when fully implemented. User fees are to be adjusted annually by a rolling average of the Implicit Price Deflator for Gross National Product index.

Summary

H.R. 3397 would authorize the establishment of a new schedule of fees that individuals who own cabins located on Forest Service lands are required to pay to the federal government. Under current law, owners of affected cabins pay an annual fee to the federal government equal to 5 percent of the appraised value of the occupied land. Under the bill, cabin owners would pay set annual fees ranging from $500 to $4,500 per cabin, depending on the appraised value of the occupied land. The fees would be adjusted based on changes in the Implicit Price Deflator for the Gross Domestic Product published by the Bureau of Economic Analysis of the Department of Commerce, applied on a 5-year rolling average.

In addition, the bill would require the Forest Service to collect transfer fees from cabin owners who sell their property, based on the sale price. Under the bill, a seller would be required to pay a fee of $1,000 upon the sale of a cabin up to $250,000. For cabins above that price, the seller would pay $1,000 and an additional 5 percent on every dollar between $250,000 and $500,000, and an additional 10 percent on every dollar above $500,000.

Cost

Because H.R. 3397 would cap annual cabin fees at $4,500 and prevent scheduled fee increases from being implemented as they would be under current law, CBO estimates that enacting the bill would lower annual receipts received through the fee program.

House Democratic Caucus Summary

The House Democratic Caucus does not provide summaries of bills.

So, yes, we display the House Republican Conference’s summaries when available even if we do not have a Democratic summary available. That’s because we feel it is better to give you as much information as possible, even if we cannot provide every viewpoint.

We’ll be looking for a source of summaries from the other side in the meanwhile.

The bill contains the following citations to other parts of U.S. law:

United States Code

The United States Code is the compilation of permanent laws enacted by Congress. Temporary and other non-permanent laws do not appear in the United States Code. (About half of the United States Code is the law itself, called positive law. The other half is merely a compilation of the laws but has no legal significance.)