H.R. 6671 (112th): Video Privacy Protection Act Amendments Act of 2012

Introduced:
Dec 17, 2012 (112th Congress, 2011–2013)
Sponsor:
Rep. Bob Goodlatte [R-VA6]
Status:
Signed by the President
Slip Law:
This bill became Pub.L. 112-258.

The bill’s title was written by the bill’s sponsor. H.R. stands for House of Representatives bill.

GovTrack’s Bill Summary

We don’t have a summary available yet.

Library of Congress Summary

The summary below was written by the Congressional Research Service, which is a nonpartisan division of the Library of Congress.


12/20/2012--Passed Senate without amendment.
(This measure has not been amended since it was introduced.
The summary of that version is repeated here.) Video Privacy Protection Act Amendments Act of 2012 - Amends provisions of the federal criminal code authorizing a video tape service provider to disclose personally identifiable information concerning any consumer to any person with the informed, written consent of the consumer to:
(1) allow such consent to be provided through an electronic means using the Internet;
(2) require such consent be in a form distinct and separate from any form setting forth other legal or financial obligations of the consumer;
(3) allow such consent to be given in advance for a set period of time, not to exceed two years or until consent is withdrawn by the consumer, whichever is sooner; and
(4) require the video tape service provider to provide an opportunity for the consumer to withdraw such consent on a case-by-case basis or to withdraw from ongoing disclosures, at the consumer's election.

House Republican Conference Summary

The summary below was written by the House Republican Conference, which is the caucus of Republicans in the House of Representatives.


This summary can be found at http://www.gop.gov/bill/112/2/hr6671.

Background

According to the House Committee on the Judiciary, the bill would modernize the way in which consumers can share information about their movie or TV show preferences.  Current law prohibits video stores from disclosing personally identifiable information that links the customer or patron to particular materials or services.  In the event of an unauthorized disclosure, an individual may bring a civil action for damages.  The law permits the disclosure of personally identifiable information under certain limited circumstances, including with the prior, written consent of the customer.

The Internet has revolutionized how consumers rent and watch movies and television programs.  Video stores have been replaced with “on-demand” cable services or Internet streaming services that allow a customer to watch a movie or TV show from their laptop or even their cell phone.  The Internet has also revolutionized how we share information about ourselves with others.  In the 1980s, when one wished to recommend a movie to friends, they would likely call them on the telephone.  In the 1990s, they would send an email.  Today, they post their opinions on their social networking page.

Current law requires a consumer to consent to sharing their movie or TV rental information each time the provider wishes to disclose.  This prevents consumers from sharing information about their movie or TV preferences through social media sites on an ongoing basis.

H.R. 6671 would remedy this restriction by amending current law to allow consumers to provide their informed, written consent once so they can – if they so choose – continuously share their movie or TV show preferences through their social media sites.  The legislation does not eliminate the requirement that consumers “opt-in” to this information sharing and it maintains the requirement of informed written consent.  The bill would allow for a one-time “opt-in” with the option for the consumer to “opt-out” of this sharing agreement at any time.

Summary

H.R. 6671 would amend the federal criminal code to require a video service provider to obtain a consumer’s informed, written, consent to disclose personally identifiable information concerning the consumer via the Internet.  The bill would require that the consent be gathered at the time the disclosure is sought and in advance for a set period of time or until consent is withdrawn by the consumer.

The House approved a similar bill, H.R. 2471, on December 6, 2011.  H.R. 6671 is identical to H.R. 2471, but includes the following changes:

  • H.R. 6671 would include an amendment offered by Rep. Nadler (D-NY) that to require the consent agreement to be separate from other agreements;
  • The bill would include a Senate amendment that would limit a consent agreement to two years; and
  • H.R. 6671 would include a Senate amendment that would allow the consumer to either opt out permanently or on a case-by-case basis.

House Democratic Caucus Summary

The House Democratic Caucus does not provide summaries of bills.

So, yes, we display the House Republican Conference’s summaries when available even if we do not have a Democratic summary available. That’s because we feel it is better to give you as much information as possible, even if we cannot provide every viewpoint.

We’ll be looking for a source of summaries from the other side in the meanwhile.

The bill contains the following citations to other parts of U.S. law:

United States Code

The United States Code is the compilation of permanent laws enacted by Congress. Temporary and other non-permanent laws do not appear in the United States Code. (About half of the United States Code is the law itself, called positive law. The other half is merely a compilation of the laws but has no legal significance.)