GovTrack’s Bill Summary
We don’t have a summary available yet.
H.Res. 72 (112th): Directing certain standing committees to inventory and review existing, pending, and proposed regulations and orders from agencies of the Federal Government, particularly with respect to their effect on jobs and economic growth.
- Introduced:
- Feb 08, 2011 (112th Congress, 2011–2013)
- Sponsor:
- Rep. Pete Sessions [R-TX32]
- Status:
- Agreed To (Simple Resolution)
The resolution’s title was written by the resolution’s sponsor. H.Res. stands for House simple resolution.
- Summary
-
No summaries available.
- Text
-
Last updated Feb 11, 2011.
3 pages
- Primary Source
-
View on THOMAS (The Library of Congress)
GovTrack gets most information from THOMAS, which is updated generally one day after events occur. Activity since the last update may not be reflected here.
- Citation
-
Click a format for a citation suggestion:
Library of Congress Summary
The summary below was written by the Congressional Research Service, which is a nonpartisan division of the Library of Congress.
2/11/2011--Passed House without amendment.
(This measure has not been amended since it was introduced.
The summary of that version is repeated here.) Requires each of the following House Committees to inventory and review existing, pending, and proposed regulations, orders, and other administrative actions or procedures by federal agencies within its jurisdiction:
(1) Agriculture,
(2) Education and the Workforce,
(3) Energy and Commerce,
(4) Financial Services,
(5) the Judiciary,
(6) Natural Resources,
(7) Oversight and Government Reform,
(8) Small Business,
(9) Transportation and Infrastructure, and
(10) Ways and Means. Requires each committee, upon completion of its inventory and review, to:
(1) consider specified matters,
(2) conduct any hearings and other oversight activities necessary in support of the inventory and review, and
(3) identify in a report on the first session of the 112th Congress any oversight or legislative activity conducted in support of, or as a result of, such inventory and review.
House Republican Conference Summary
The summary below was written by the House Republican Conference, which is the caucus of Republicans in the House of Representatives.
This summary can be found at http://www.gop.gov/bill/112/1/hres72.
Background
Background
Federal regulations impose tens of thousands of dollars in additional costs for households and businesses each year. According to the Small Business Administration (SBA), the average small business with less than 20 employees faces a cost of $10,585 in federal regulations each year per worker they employ. Businesses with fewer than 20 employees spend on average 36 percent more per employee than larger firms to comply with federal regulations. According to the SBA, these small employers represent 99.7 percent of all businesses and have created 64 percent of all new jobs over the past 15 years. Ultimately, the cost of federal regulations to small businesses must either be passed on to the consumer or workers, either in the form of lower wages or a shortage of jobs that would have been otherwise paid for with money spent complying with federal regulations.
A recent study by the Heritage Foundation found that an unprecedented 43 major regulations were imposed in fiscal year 2010 with a total economic cost of $26.5 billion, the highest total since at least 1981. In addition, the Wall St. Journal reported that the Democrats’ new finance law contains an expected 243 new rulemakings. Since passage in March 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ObamaCare) has added 6,123 pages of regulations and Federal Register notices in just its first nine months. According to a September 2010 report from the SBA, total regulatory costs amount to $1.75 trillion annually, nearly twice as much as all individual income taxes collected last year.
Summary
H.Res. 72 would direct ten standing committees to inventory and review existing, pending, and proposed government regulations by agencies within their jurisdiction. While conducting the inventory and review, each committee would be required to identify each regulation’s effect on jobs and economic growth. Specifically, committees would be required to identify and inventory regulations that do the following:
- Impede private-sector job creation;
- Discourage innovation and entrepreneurial activity;
- Hurt economic growth and investment;
- Harm the Nation’s global competitiveness;
- Limit access to credit and capital;
- Fail to utilize or apply accurate cost-benefit analyses;
- Create additional economic uncertainty;
- Are promulgated in such a way as to limit transparency and the opportunity for public comment, particularly by affected parties;
- Lack specific statutory authorization;
- Undermine labor-management relations;
- Result in large-scale unfunded mandates on employers without due cause; or
- Impose undue paperwork and cost burdens on small businesses.
The following committees would be required to conduct an inventory of existing and pending regulations:
- The Committee on Agriculture;
- The Committee on Education and the Workforce;
- The Committee on Energy and Commerce;
- The Committee on Financial Services;
- The Committee on the Judiciary;
- The Committee on Natural Resources;
- The Committee on Oversight and Government Reform;
- The Committee on Small Business;
- The Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure; and
- The Committee on Ways and Means.
House Democratic Caucus Summary
The House Democratic Caucus does not provide summaries of bills.
So, yes, we display the House Republican Conference’s summaries when available even if we do not have a Democratic summary available. That’s because we feel it is better to give you as much information as possible, even if we cannot provide every viewpoint.
We’ll be looking for a source of summaries from the other side in the meanwhile.