S.Res. 111 (112th): A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate that Congress should reject any proposal for the creation ...
...of a system of global taxation and regulation.
112th Congress, 2011–2013. Text as of Mar 29, 2011 (Introduced).
Status & Summary | PDF | Source: GPO
SRES 111 IS
112th CONGRESS
1st Session
S. RES. 111
Expressing the sense of the Senate that Congress should reject any proposal for the creation of a system of global taxation and regulation.
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
March 29, 2011
March 29, 2011
Mr. VITTER submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Finance
RESOLUTION
Expressing the sense of the Senate that Congress should reject any proposal for the creation of a system of global taxation and regulation.
Whereas many proposals are pending in Congress--
(1) to increase taxes;
(2) to regulate businesses; and
(3) to continue runaway Government spending;
Whereas taxpayer funding has already financed major, on-going bailouts of the financial sector;
Whereas the proposed cap-and-trade system would result in trillions of dollars in new taxes and job-killing regulations;
Whereas a number of nongovernmental organizations are proposing that a cap-and-trade regulatory system be adopted on a global scale;
Whereas the ‘outcome document’ produced by the September 20-22, 2010, United Nations Summit on the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) commits the nations of the world, including the United States, to supporting ‘innovative financing mechanisms’ to supplement foreign aid spending;
Whereas the term ‘innovative financing mechanisms’ is a United Nations euphemism for global taxes;
Whereas the ‘Leading Group on Innovative Financing for Development,’ a group of 63 countries, seeks to promote the implementation of ‘innovative financing mechanisms’;
Whereas a ‘Task Force on International Financial Transactions for Development’ is working within the Leading Group and with the United Nations to propose and implement global tax schemes;
Whereas ‘innovative financing mechanisms’ are going to be on the agenda for the G8 and G20 summits in France in 2011;
Whereas new international taxation and regulatory proposals would be an affront to the sovereignty of the United States;
Whereas the best manner by which to overcome the economic downturn in the United States includes taking measures that would--
(1) lower tax rates;
(2) reduce Government spending; and
(3) impose fewer onerous and unnecessary regulations on job creation; and
Whereas the worst manner by which to overcome the economic downturn in the United States includes taking measures that would--
(1) increase tax rates; and
(2) expand government intervention, including intervention on a global scale: Now, therefore, be it
Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that Congress should reject any proposal for the creation of--
(1) ‘innovative financing mechanisms’ or global taxes;
(2) an international system of government bailouts for the financial sector;
(3) a global cap-and-trade system or other climate regulations that would--
(A) punish businesses in the United States; and
(B) limit the competitiveness of the United States; and
(4) a global tax system that would violate the sovereignty of the United States.