GovTrack’s Bill Summary
We don’t have a summary available yet.
The bill’s title was written by the bill’s sponsor. H.R. stands for House of Representatives bill.
We don’t have a summary available yet.
The summary below was written by the Congressional Research Service, which is a nonpartisan division of the Library of Congress.
The summary below was written by the House Republican Conference, which is the caucus of Republicans in the House of Representatives.
This summary can be found at http://www.gop.gov/bill/113/1/hr1158.
Many of the lakes that are part of the North Cascades National Park have been stocked with fish since the late 1800s, long before they became part of the National Park System. Ever since, volunteers have stocked the lakes under management plans developed by National Park Service (NPS) and State biologists.[1]
In 2008, NPS prepared an Environmental Impact Statement, which determined that fish stocking would produce no adverse effects in 42 of the Park’s lakes. Consequently, NPS requested explicit statutory authority to continue stocking the lakes in the Park.[2]
H.R. 1158 would authorize the NPS to continue this longstanding tradition. An identical bill (H.R. 2351) passed the House in the 112th Congress by voice vote on December 7, 2011.
H.R. 1158 directs the Secretary of the Interior to authorize the stocking of fish in 42 lakes in the North Cascades National Park. The lakes are to be stocked with only native nonreproducing fish, and the Secretary is directed to coordinate with the State of Washington. Furthermore, the bill requires the Secretary to research and monitor the effects of fish stocking in the relevant lakes and to report to Congress every five years after enactment on the results.
CBO estimates that enacting H.R. 1158 would “have no significant effect on the federal budget.”[1]
The House Democratic Caucus does not provide summaries of bills.
So, yes, we display the House Republican Conference’s summaries when available even if we do not have a Democratic summary available. That’s because we feel it is better to give you as much information as possible, even if we cannot provide every viewpoint.
We’ll be looking for a source of summaries from the other side in the meanwhile.