H.R. 1206: Permanent Electronic Duck Stamp Act of 2013

Introduced:
Mar 14, 2013 (113th Congress, 2013–2015)
Sponsor:
Rep. Robert Wittman [R-VA1]
Status:
Passed House

The bill’s title was written by the bill’s sponsor. H.R. stands for House of Representatives bill.

Track this bill

GovTrack’s Bill Summary

We don’t have a summary available yet.

Library of Congress Summary

The summary below was written by the Congressional Research Service, which is a nonpartisan division of the Library of Congress.


3/14/2013--Introduced.
Permanent Electronic Duck Stamp Act of 2013 - Grants the Secretary of the Interior permanent authority to authorize any state to issue electronic duck stamps. Sets forth state electronic duck stamp application requirements.

House Republican Conference Summary

The summary below was written by the House Republican Conference, which is the caucus of Republicans in the House of Representatives.


This summary can be found at http://www.gop.gov/bill/113/1/hr1206.

Background

In 1934, Congress established the Federal Duck Stamp Program as a way to provide funds for the purchase or lease of lands important to the protection of migratory waterfowl.  Under the program, any hunter over the age of 16 who wishes to hunt migratory waterfowl must purchase an annual Federal duck stamp.  The price has increased from $1 in 1934 to the current cost of $15.[1] 

While the number of duck stamps sold in any individual year varies, in recent decades the number of ducks stamps has declined.  In 2006, Congress passed the Electronic Duck Stamp Act of 2006, which established a pilot program to evaluate the feasibility of electronic duck stamps.  A 2011 report from the Fish & Wildlife Service concluded that “The E-Stamp Program has proven to be a practical method that is readily accepted by the stamp-buying public.  The increased sale of E-Stamps, coupled with few complaints about the process through the three-year pilot, suggests customers are satisfied with this method of acquiring their Duck Stamps…”[2]

H.R. 1206 permanently allows the Fish & Wildlife Service to sell these Electronic Duck Stamps.  Similar legislation passed the House in the 112th Congress by a recorded vote of 373-1 (Roll no. 5).


[1] See Committee Report 113-67 pg. 2

[2] Id.

Summary

H.R. 1206 permanently authorizes states to sell electronic Federal duck stamps to supplement printed duck stamps.  Specifically, the bill also outlines state obligations in making electronic stamps available and requires states to submit to the Secretary of the Interior a detailed plan prior to making them available.  Finally, H.R. 1206 includes a provision allowing the Secretary to terminate a states’ authority to issue electronic stamps if it violates the terms of its application.

Cost

Because the legislation authorizes the receipts from the sale of Duck Stamps to be spent without future appropriation, the legislation would affect direct spending and revenues.  As such, pay-as-you-go procedures apply.  However, CBO estimates that, “the net effects of enacting the bill would be insignificant for each year and over the 2014-2023 period because the legislation would not have a significant impact on the number of federal duck stamps purchased.”[1]

House Democratic Caucus Summary

The House Democratic Caucus does not provide summaries of bills.

So, yes, we display the House Republican Conference’s summaries when available even if we do not have a Democratic summary available. That’s because we feel it is better to give you as much information as possible, even if we cannot provide every viewpoint.

We’ll be looking for a source of summaries from the other side in the meanwhile.

The bill contains the following citations to other parts of U.S. law:

United States Code

The United States Code is the compilation of permanent laws enacted by Congress. Temporary and other non-permanent laws do not appear in the United States Code. (About half of the United States Code is the law itself, called positive law. The other half is merely a compilation of the laws but has no legal significance.)