H.R. 235: Veteran Emergency Medical Technician Support Act of 2013

Introduced:
Jan 14, 2013 (113th Congress, 2013–2015)
Sponsor:
Rep. Adam Kinzinger [R-IL16]
Status:
Passed House

The bill’s title was written by the bill’s sponsor. H.R. stands for House of Representatives bill.

Track this bill

GovTrack’s Bill Summary

We don’t have a summary available yet.

Library of Congress Summary

The summary below was written by the Congressional Research Service, which is a nonpartisan division of the Library of Congress.


2/12/2013--Passed House without amendment.
Veteran Emergency Medical Technician Support Act of 2013 - Amends the Public Health Service Act to direct the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) to establish a demonstration program for states with a shortage of emergency medical technicians (EMTs) to streamline state requirements and procedures to assist veterans who completed military EMT training while serving in the Armed Forces to meet state EMT certification, licensure, and other requirements.
Authorizations appropriations for this Act out of funding for area health education centers.

House Republican Conference Summary

The summary below was written by the House Republican Conference, which is the caucus of Republicans in the House of Representatives.


This summary can be found at http://www.gop.gov/bill/113/1/hr235.

Background

On September 19, 2012, the House passed H.R. 4124 by voice vote.  H.R. 4124 is nearly identical to H.R. 235, with changes limited to minor technical corrections and updates. For more information, see H.R. 4124 here.

Summary

H.R. 235 amends the Public Health Service Act to provide demonstration grants to states with EMT shortages. H.R. 235 streamlines state certification requirements to support returning veterans who have already completed military EMT training enter the workforce without unnecessary duplication of their training.  The bill also requires an annual report to Congress.

Cost

According to CBO, The bill would authorize the appropriation of $1 million and CBO estimates that implementing the bill woul dcost $1 million over the 2014-2018 period, assuming the appropriation of the authorized amount.  Pay-as-you-go procedures do not apply to this legislation because it would not affect direct spending or revenues.

House Democratic Caucus Summary

The House Democratic Caucus does not provide summaries of bills.

So, yes, we display the House Republican Conference’s summaries when available even if we do not have a Democratic summary available. That’s because we feel it is better to give you as much information as possible, even if we cannot provide every viewpoint.

We’ll be looking for a source of summaries from the other side in the meanwhile.

The bill contains the following citations to other parts of U.S. law:

United States Code

The United States Code is the compilation of permanent laws enacted by Congress. Temporary and other non-permanent laws do not appear in the United States Code. (About half of the United States Code is the law itself, called positive law. The other half is merely a compilation of the laws but has no legal significance.)