S. 2350 (94th): A bill to amend the National Security Act of 1947, as amended, to include the Secretary of the Treasury as a member of the National Security Council.

Introduced:
Sep 17, 1975 (94th Congress, 1975–1976)
Sponsor:
Sen. William “Stuart” Symington [D-MO]
Status:
Vetoed (No Override Attempt)

The bill’s title was written by the bill’s sponsor. S. stands for Senate bill.

(About Ads | Go Ad-Free for $5)
Status

This bill was vetoed by the President on December 31, 1975 and Congress did not attempt an override before the end of the Congressional session.

Progress
Introduced Sep 17, 1975
Referred to Committee Sep 17, 1975
Passed Senate Oct 09, 1975
Passed House Dec 17, 1975
Vetoed (No Override Attempt) Dec 31, 1975
Cosponsors
22 cosponsors (16D, 5R, 1I) (show)
Committees

House Armed Services

Senate Armed Services

The committee chair determines whether a bill will move past the committee stage.

Summary

No summaries available.

Text

Text not yet available.

Primary Source

View on THOMAS (The Library of Congress)

GovTrack gets most information from THOMAS, which is updated generally one day after events occur. Activity since the last update may not be reflected here.

Citation

Click a format for a citation suggestion:

GovTrack’s Bill Summary

We don’t have a summary available yet.

Library of Congress Summary

The summary below was written by the Congressional Research Service, which is a nonpartisan division of the Library of Congress.

9/17/1975--Introduced.
Revises the National Security Act to include the Secretary of the Treasury as a member of the National Security Council.

House Republican Conference Summary

The summary below was written by the House Republican Conference, which is the caucus of Republicans in the House of Representatives.

No summary available.

House Democratic Caucus Summary

The House Democratic Caucus does not provide summaries of bills.

So, yes, we display the House Republican Conference’s summaries when available even if we do not have a Democratic summary available. That’s because we feel it is better to give you as much information as possible, even if we cannot provide every viewpoint.

We’ll be looking for a source of summaries from the other side in the meanwhile.