AB2674. Employment records: right to inspect.

California State Legislature. 2011-2012 Session. Assembly.

Introduced:
Mar 05, 2012
Last Action:
Sep 30, 2012
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 842, Statutes of 2012.
Official Source

State legislative information provided by LegiNation, Inc. and LegiScan, Inc. Some information also from Open States.

History

Mar 05, 2012: Read first time. To print.

Mar 06, 2012: From printer. May be heard in committee April 5.

Mar 19, 2012: Referred to Com. on L. & E.

Mar 27, 2012: From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on L. & E. Read second time and amended.

Mar 28, 2012: Re-referred to Com. on L. & E.

Apr 09, 2012: From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on L. & E. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on L. & E.

Apr 19, 2012: From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (April 18). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

May 02, 2012: From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 2).

May 03, 2012: Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

May 07, 2012: Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate.

May 07, 2012: Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 48. Noes 25.)

May 07, 2012: Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 48. Noes 25. Page 4712.)

May 07, 2012: In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

May 17, 2012: Referred to Coms. on L. & I.R. and JUD.

Jun 13, 2012: From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (June 13). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

Jul 02, 2012: From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 3. Noes 1.) (June 26).

Jul 03, 2012: Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

Aug 06, 2012: From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.

Aug 07, 2012: Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

Aug 20, 2012: Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

Aug 21, 2012: Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

Aug 23, 2012: Read third time and amended. Ordered to third reading.

Aug 23, 2012: Read third time and amended. Ordered to third reading. (Page 4788.)

Aug 24, 2012: Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

Aug 28, 2012: Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 23. Noes 13.).

Aug 28, 2012: Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 23. Noes 13. Page 4889.).

Aug 28, 2012: In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 30 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.

Aug 29, 2012: Assembly Rule 77 suspended. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling.

Aug 29, 2012: Assembly Rule 77 suspended. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 53. Noes 26.).

Aug 29, 2012: Assembly Rule 77 suspended. (Page 6488.) Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 53. Noes 26. Page 6567.).

Sep 13, 2012: Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3:30 p.m.

Sep 30, 2012: Approved by the Governor.

Sep 30, 2012: Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 842, Statutes of 2012.

Summary

AB 2674, Swanson. Employment records: right to inspect. (1) Existing law requires that every employer, semimonthly or at the time of each payment of wages, furnish to each of his or her employees, either as a detachable part of the check, draft, or voucher paying the employee's wages, or separately when wages are paid by personal check or cash, an accurate itemized statement in writing showing specified items. Existing law requires an employer to keep a copy of the statement and the record of deductions on file for at least 3 years at the place of employment or at a central location within the State of California. This bill would provide that the term "copy," for purposes of these provisions, includes a duplicate of the itemized statement provided to an employee or a computer-generated record that accurately shows all of the information that existing law requires to be included in the itemized statement. (2) Under existing law, an employee has the right to inspect the personnel records that his or her employer maintains relating to the employee's performance or to any grievance concerning the employee. This bill would require an employer to maintain personnel records for a specified period of time and to provide a current or former employee, or his or her representative, an opportunity to inspect and receive a copy of those records within a specified period of time, except during the pendency of a lawsuit filed by the employee or former employer relating to a personnel matter. The bill would provide that an employer is not required to comply with more than 50 requests for a copy of the above-described records filed by a representative or representatives of employees in one calendar month. The bill would provide that the above provisions shall not apply with respect to an employee covered by a valid collective bargaining agreement if the agreement provides, among other things, for a procedure for inspection and copying of personnel records. In the event an employer violates these provisions, the bill would permit a current or former employee or the Labor Commissioner to recover a penalty of $750 from the employer, and would further permit a current or former employee to obtain injunctive relief and attorney's fees. Under existing law, an employer who fails to permit an employee to inspect the employee's personnel records is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine or imprisonment, as specified. This bill would, instead, provide that a violation of the above provisions requiring that personnel records be made available for inspection constitutes an infraction. Although this bill would change a violation of the above provisions requiring that personnel records be made available for inspection from a misdemeanor to an infraction, by expanding the scope of what would constitute an infraction, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (3) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. (4) This bill would incorporate changes to Section 226 of the Labor Code proposed by AB 1744 and SB 1255, to be operative only if this bill and either or both of those bills are chaptered and became effective on or before January 1, 2013, and this bill is chaptered last.