History
Dec 21, 2012: Introduced. To print.
Dec 24, 2012: From printer. May be heard in committee January 23.
Jan 07, 2013: Read first time.
Mar 19, 2013: Referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
Mar 19, 2013: Referred to Com. on NAT. RES. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES. Read second time and amended.
Mar 19, 2013: From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES. Read second time and amended.
Mar 20, 2013: Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
Mar 20, 2013: Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
Apr 08, 2013: From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES. Read second time and amended.
Apr 09, 2013: Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
Apr 16, 2013: From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (April 15). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
Apr 19, 2013: From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Read second time and amended.
Apr 22, 2013: Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
May 15, 2013: In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
Summary
AB 52, as amended, Gatto. Native Americans: California Environmental Quality Act. Existing law, the Native American Historic Resource Protection Act, establishes a misdemeanor for unlawfully and maliciously excavating upon, removing, destroying, injuring, or defacing a Native American historic, cultural, or sacred site, that is listed or may be eligible for listing in the California Register of Historic Resources. The California Environmental Quality Act, referred to as CEQA, requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of, an environmental impact report on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA also requires a lead agency to prepare a mitigated negative declaration for a project that may have a significant effect on the environment if revisions in the project would avoid or mitigate that effect and there is no substantial evidence that the project, as revised, would have a significant effect on the environment. CEQA requires the lead agency to provide a responsible agency with specified notice and opportunities to comment on a proposed project. CEQA requires the Office of Planning and Research to prepare and develop, and the Secretary of the Natural Resources Agency to certify and adopt, guidelines for the implementation of CEQA that include, among other things, criteria for public agencies to following in determining whether or not a proposed project may have a significant effect on the environment. The bill would specify that a project having a potential to cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal resource, as defined, to be a project that may have a significant effect on the environment. The bill would require a lead agency to make best efforts to avoid, preserve, and protect specified Native American resources. The bill would require the lead agency to undertake specified actions if a project may adversely affect tribal cultural resources, or a tribal reservation or rancheria. The bill would require the office to revise the guidelines to include criteria for determining whether a proposed project has a significant effect on the environment to include effects on tribal cultural resources, including sacred places, or a tribal reservation or rancheria community. The bill would require the office to prepare and develop, and the secretary to certify and adopt, revisions to the guidelines relating to the identification and treatment of tribal cultural resources. By requiring the lead agency to consider these effects relative to Native Americans, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: yes.