H.R. 2861 (100th): Product Liability Reform Act of 1987

Introduced:
Jul 01, 1987 (100th Congress, 1987–1988)
Status:
Died (Referred to Committee)
Sponsor
William Clinger Jr.
Representative for Pennsylvania's 23rd congressional district
Party
Republican
Related Bills
H.R. 1599 (identical)

Referred to Committee
Last Action: Mar 12, 1987

 
Status

This bill was introduced on July 1, 1987, in a previous session of Congress, but was not enacted.

Progress
Introduced Jul 01, 1987
Referred to Committee Jul 01, 1987
 
Full Title

A bill to promote the interests of consumers and to ensure that the free flow of products in interstate commerce is not impeded by product liability law, and for other purposes.

Summary

No summaries available.

Cosponsors
4 cosponsors (4R) (show)
Committees

House Energy and Commerce

House Judiciary

Regulatory Reform, Commercial, and Antitrust Law

The committee chair determines whether a bill will move past the committee stage.

 
Primary Source

THOMAS.gov (The Library of Congress)

GovTrack gets most information from THOMAS, which is updated generally one day after events occur. Activity since the last update may not be reflected here. Data comes via the congress project.

Widget

Get a bill status widget for your website »

Citation

Click a format for a citation suggestion:

Notes

H.R. stands for House of Representatives bill.

A bill must be passed by both the House and Senate in identical form and then be signed by the president to become law.

The bill’s title was written by its sponsor.

GovTrack’s Bill Summary

We don’t have a summary available yet.

Library of Congress Summary

The summary below was written by the Congressional Research Service, which is a nonpartisan division of the Library of Congress.


7/1/1987--Introduced.
Product Liability Reform Act of 1987 - Preempts inconsistent State law, within limitations contained in this Act. Subjects the seller of a defective product unreasonably dangerous to a user or consumer to strict liability for physical damage caused by the product when:
(1) the seller is engaged in the business of selling such a product; and
(2) the product reaches the user or consumer without substantial alteration in its condition.
Denies liability in instances when the harm results:
(1) more from the user's negligence than from the negligence of the product seller;
(2) from an unreasonable misuse of the product even if foreseeable and feasibly preventable; and
(3) from a defect that could not have been discovered and eliminated given the technology at the time the product was made.
Prohibits the application of the doctrine of joint and several liability to product liability actions, except in cases when persons acting in concert are the proximate cause of the injury.
Sets a limitation on the amount of noneconomic damages that can be recovered.
Permits an award of punitive damages in a product liability action only when:
(1) it is shown that the person subject to liability acted with flagrant indifference to consumer safety; and
(2) compensatory damages are awarded.
Prohibits an award of punitive damages against a manufacturer or seller of a drug or medical device if the drug or device was subject to premarket approval by the Secretary of Health and Human Services or if the drug is generally recognized as safe and effective pursuant to conditions established in regulations of the Secretary. Permits structured settlements and periodic payment of damages awarded for future economic loss.
Requires that damage awards be offset by amounts received as compensation for the same injury from specified collateral sources.
Establishes a contingency fee schedule to govern compensation for plaintiffs' attorneys.
Imposes a two-year statute of limitations on product liability actions, commencing upon the discovery of harm.
Establishes a ten-year statute of repose for product liability actions, with a longer period applicable in certain cases.
Directs the Attorney General to provide to the Congress, within one year of this Act's enactment, recommendations to encourage and accommodate the creation, adoption, and use of alternative dispute resolution techniques in civil disputes filed in Federal courts.

House Republican Conference Summary

The summary below was written by the House Republican Conference, which is the caucus of Republicans in the House of Representatives.


No summary available.

House Democratic Caucus Summary

The House Democratic Caucus does not provide summaries of bills.

So, yes, we display the House Republican Conference’s summaries when available even if we do not have a Democratic summary available. That’s because we feel it is better to give you as much information as possible, even if we cannot provide every viewpoint.

We’ll be looking for a source of summaries from the other side in the meanwhile.

Use the comment space below for discussion of the merits of H.R. 2861 (100th) with other GovTrack users.
Your comments are not read by Congressional staff.

comments powered by Disqus