H.Con.Res. 108 (101st): Expressing the sense of the Congress that the Vatican should recognize the State of Israel and should establish diplomatic relations with that country.

Introduced:
May 04, 1989 (101st Congress, 1989–1990)
Status:
Died (Referred to Committee)
Sponsor
Edward Feighan
Representative for Ohio's 19th congressional district
Party
Democrat
Related Bills
H.Con.Res. 298 (102nd) was a re-introduction of this bill in a later Congress.

Referred to Committee
Last Action: Mar 24, 1992

 
Status

This resolution was introduced on May 4, 1989, in a previous session of Congress, but was not enacted.

Progress
Introduced May 04, 1989
Referred to Committee May 04, 1989
 
 
Primary Source

THOMAS.gov (The Library of Congress)

GovTrack gets most information from THOMAS, which is updated generally one day after events occur. Activity since the last update may not be reflected here. Data comes via the congress project.

Widget

Get a bill status widget for your website »

Citation

Click a format for a citation suggestion:

Notes

H.Con.Res. stands for House concurrent resolution.

A concurrent resolution is often used for matters that affect the rules of Congress or to express the sentiment of Congress. It must be agreed to by both the House and Senate in identical form but is not signed by the president and does not carry the force of law.

The resolution’s title was written by its sponsor.

GovTrack’s Bill Summary

We don’t have a summary available yet.

Library of Congress Summary

The summary below was written by the Congressional Research Service, which is a nonpartisan division of the Library of Congress.


5/4/1989--Introduced.
Expresses the sense of the Congress that the Vatican should grant recognition to and establish diplomatic relations with Israel.

House Republican Conference Summary

The summary below was written by the House Republican Conference, which is the caucus of Republicans in the House of Representatives.


No summary available.

House Democratic Caucus Summary

The House Democratic Caucus does not provide summaries of bills.

So, yes, we display the House Republican Conference’s summaries when available even if we do not have a Democratic summary available. That’s because we feel it is better to give you as much information as possible, even if we cannot provide every viewpoint.

We’ll be looking for a source of summaries from the other side in the meanwhile.

Use the comment space below for discussion of the merits of H.Con.Res. 108 (101st) with other GovTrack users.
Your comments are not read by Congressional staff.

comments powered by Disqus