H.R. 3257 (101st): Stratospheric Ozone Layer Protection Act

Introduced:
Sep 12, 1989 (101st Congress, 1989–1990)
Status:
Died (Referred to Committee)
Sponsor
Peter Smith
Representative for Vermont At Large
Party
Republican
Related Bills
S. 1035 (identical)

Referred to Committee
Last Action: May 18, 1989

 
Status

This bill was introduced on September 12, 1989, in a previous session of Congress, but was not enacted.

Progress
Introduced Sep 12, 1989
Referred to Committee Sep 12, 1989
 
Full Title

To restrict certain uses of chlorofluorocarbons to protect the ozone layer in the stratosphere, and for other purposes.

Summary

No summaries available.

Cosponsors
4 cosponsors (3D, 1R) (show)
Committees

House Energy and Commerce

The committee chair determines whether a bill will move past the committee stage.

 
Primary Source

THOMAS.gov (The Library of Congress)

GovTrack gets most information from THOMAS, which is updated generally one day after events occur. Activity since the last update may not be reflected here. Data comes via the congress project.

Widget

Get a bill status widget for your website »

Citation

Click a format for a citation suggestion:

Notes

H.R. stands for House of Representatives bill.

A bill must be passed by both the House and Senate in identical form and then be signed by the president to become law.

The bill’s title was written by its sponsor.

GovTrack’s Bill Summary

We don’t have a summary available yet.

Library of Congress Summary

The summary below was written by the Congressional Research Service, which is a nonpartisan division of the Library of Congress.


9/12/1989--Introduced.
Stratospheric Ozone Layer Protection Act - Directs the Secretary of Commerce to issue regulations prohibiting the installation, maintenance, and repair of motor vehicle air conditioners after 1990, unless equipment certified as meeting standards set by the Society of Automotive Engineers for the extraction and reclamation of refrigerants is used.
Requires service entities to document the number of air conditioners serviced and the amount of chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) purchased and sold by such entities.
Prohibits, after FY 1989, the sale of a CFC coolant in containers containing less than 15 pounds of such coolant if such container does not have a warning label indicating the danger such coolant poses to the stratospheric ozone layer.
Prohibits, after 1990, the sale of any CFC coolant for use in a motor vehicle air conditioner:
(1) other than for commercial or industrial use; and
(2) in a container containing less than 15 pounds of such coolant.
Prohibits the sale in, or export from, the United States of any motor vehicle manufactured after model year 1992 which contains an air conditioner using CFCs. Requires the Administrator to study and report to the Congress on the use of ozone-depleting chemicals, substitutes for such chemicals, and opportunities for recycling and recovery of such chemicals.
Directs the Administrator, no later than January 15, 1991, to study and report to the Congress on ways to accomplish the systematic retrieval, storage, and reuse of CFCs from refrigerators, air conditioners, and motor vehicles facing immediate disposal.
Directs the Administrator, no later than January 15, 1992, to study and report to the Congress on current information concerning ozone depletion and the development of motor vehicles which employ air conditioners using refrigerants other than CFCs. Directs the Secretary and the Administrator to consult with motor vehicle dealers and other appropriate business entities to publicize this Act.

House Republican Conference Summary

The summary below was written by the House Republican Conference, which is the caucus of Republicans in the House of Representatives.


No summary available.

House Democratic Caucus Summary

The House Democratic Caucus does not provide summaries of bills.

So, yes, we display the House Republican Conference’s summaries when available even if we do not have a Democratic summary available. That’s because we feel it is better to give you as much information as possible, even if we cannot provide every viewpoint.

We’ll be looking for a source of summaries from the other side in the meanwhile.

Use the comment space below for discussion of the merits of H.R. 3257 (101st) with other GovTrack users.
Your comments are not read by Congressional staff.

comments powered by Disqus