H.R. 3670 (101st): To authorize the appropriation of sums necessary for the expansion of the membership of the Superior Court of the District of Columbia from 50 associate judges to 58 associate judges.

Nov 16, 1989 (101st Congress, 1989–1990)
Signed by the President on Dec 13, 1989
Slip Law:
This bill became Pub.L. 101-232.

This bill was enacted after being signed by the President on December 13, 1989.

Nov 16, 1989
Passed House
Nov 17, 1989
Passed Senate
Nov 20, 1989
Signed by the President
Dec 13, 1989
Walter Fauntroy
Delegate for District of Columbia At Large
Read Text »
Last Updated
Dec 13, 1989

No summaries available.

3 cosponsors (2D, 1R) (show)

House District of Columbia

The committee chair determines whether a bill will move past the committee stage.

Primary Source

THOMAS.gov (The Library of Congress)

GovTrack gets most information from THOMAS, which is updated generally one day after events occur. Activity since the last update may not be reflected here. Data comes via the congress project.


Get a bill status widget for your website »


Click a format for a citation suggestion:


H.R. stands for House of Representatives bill.

A bill must be passed by both the House and Senate in identical form and then be signed by the president to become law.

GovTrack’s Bill Summary

We don’t have a summary available yet.

Library of Congress Summary

The summary below was written by the Congressional Research Service, which is a nonpartisan division of the Library of Congress.

11/17/1989--Passed House amended.
Amends the District of Columbia Code to authorize increasing the number of associate judges on the Superior Court of the District of Columbia.

House Republican Conference Summary

The summary below was written by the House Republican Conference, which is the caucus of Republicans in the House of Representatives.

No summary available.

House Democratic Caucus Summary

The House Democratic Caucus does not provide summaries of bills.

So, yes, we display the House Republican Conference’s summaries when available even if we do not have a Democratic summary available. That’s because we feel it is better to give you as much information as possible, even if we cannot provide every viewpoint.

We’ll be looking for a source of summaries from the other side in the meanwhile.

Use the comment space below for discussion of the merits of H.R. 3670 (101st) with other GovTrack users.
Your comments are not read by Congressional staff.

comments powered by Disqus