H.Con.Res. 249 (102nd): Correcting a technical error in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 1724.

Introduced:
Nov 26, 1991 (102nd Congress, 1991–1992)
Status:
Agreed To (Concurrent Resolution)
Sponsor
Daniel Rostenkowski
Representative for Illinois's 8th congressional district
Party
Democrat
Text
Read Text »
Last Updated
Nov 26, 1991
Length
Related Bills
H.R. 1724 (Related)
Andean Trade Preference Act

Signed by the President
Dec 04, 1991

 
Status

This concurrent resolution was agreed to by both chambers of Congress on November 26, 1991. That is the end of the legislative process for concurrent resolutions. They do not have the force of law.

Progress
Introduced Nov 26, 1991
Passed Senate Nov 26, 1991
Passed House Nov 26, 1991
 
Summary

No summaries available.

Cosponsors
none
 
Primary Source

THOMAS.gov (The Library of Congress)

GovTrack gets most information from THOMAS, which is updated generally one day after events occur. Activity since the last update may not be reflected here. Data comes via the congress project.

Widget

Get a bill status widget for your website »

Citation

Click a format for a citation suggestion:

Notes

H.Con.Res. stands for House concurrent resolution.

A concurrent resolution is often used for matters that affect the rules of Congress or to express the sentiment of Congress. It must be agreed to by both the House and Senate in identical form but is not signed by the president and does not carry the force of law.

GovTrack’s Bill Summary

We don’t have a summary available yet.

Library of Congress Summary

The summary below was written by the Congressional Research Service, which is a nonpartisan division of the Library of Congress.


11/26/1991--Introduced.
Makes technical corrections in the enrollment of H.R. 1724 (foreign trade).

House Republican Conference Summary

The summary below was written by the House Republican Conference, which is the caucus of Republicans in the House of Representatives.


No summary available.

House Democratic Caucus Summary

The House Democratic Caucus does not provide summaries of bills.

So, yes, we display the House Republican Conference’s summaries when available even if we do not have a Democratic summary available. That’s because we feel it is better to give you as much information as possible, even if we cannot provide every viewpoint.

We’ll be looking for a source of summaries from the other side in the meanwhile.

Use the comment space below for discussion of the merits of H.Con.Res. 249 (102nd) with other GovTrack users.
Your comments are not read by Congressional staff.

comments powered by Disqus