H.R. 6000 (102nd): To redesignate Springer Mountain National Recreation Area as “Ed Jenkins National Recreation Area”.

Introduced:
Sep 23, 1992 (102nd Congress, 1991–1992)
Status:
Signed by the President
Slip Law:
This bill became Pub.L. 102-456.
Sponsor
Druie Barnard Jr.
Representative for Georgia's 10th congressional district
Party
Democrat
Text
Read Text »
Last Updated
Oct 23, 1992
Length
 
Status

This bill was enacted after being signed by the President on October 23, 1992.

Progress
Introduced Sep 23, 1992
Referred to Committee Sep 23, 1992
Reported by Committee Sep 24, 1992
Passed House Sep 29, 1992
Passed Senate Oct 08, 1992
Signed by the President Oct 23, 1992
 
Summary

No summaries available.

 
Primary Source

THOMAS.gov (The Library of Congress)

GovTrack gets most information from THOMAS, which is updated generally one day after events occur. Activity since the last update may not be reflected here. Data comes via the congress project.

Widget

Get a bill status widget for your website »

Citation

Click a format for a citation suggestion:

Notes

H.R. stands for House of Representatives bill.

A bill must be passed by both the House and Senate in identical form and then be signed by the president to become law.

GovTrack’s Bill Summary

We don’t have a summary available yet.

Library of Congress Summary

The summary below was written by the Congressional Research Service, which is a nonpartisan division of the Library of Congress.


9/23/1992--Introduced.
Redesignates the Springer Mountain National Recreation Area in the Chattahoochee National Forest, Georgia, as the Ed Jenkins National Recreation Area.

House Republican Conference Summary

The summary below was written by the House Republican Conference, which is the caucus of Republicans in the House of Representatives.


No summary available.

House Democratic Caucus Summary

The House Democratic Caucus does not provide summaries of bills.

So, yes, we display the House Republican Conference’s summaries when available even if we do not have a Democratic summary available. That’s because we feel it is better to give you as much information as possible, even if we cannot provide every viewpoint.

We’ll be looking for a source of summaries from the other side in the meanwhile.

Use the comment space below for discussion of the merits of H.R. 6000 (102nd) with other GovTrack users.
Your comments are not read by Congressional staff.

comments powered by Disqus