H.R. 240 (103rd): Bodie Protection Act of 1993

Introduced:
Jan 05, 1993 (103rd Congress, 1993–1994)
Status:
Died (Passed House) in a previous session of Congress

This bill was introduced in a previous session of Congress and was passed by the House on May 11, 1993 but was never passed by the Senate.

Introduced
Jan 05, 1993
Reported by Committee
May 05, 1993
Passed House
May 11, 1993
 
Sponsor
Richard Lehman
Representative for California's 19th congressional district
Party
Democrat
Text
Read Text »
Last Updated
May 13, 1993
Length
10 pages
Related Bills
H.R. 4370 (102nd) was a previous version of this bill.

Passed House
Last Action: Jul 27, 1992

H.R. 518 (Related)
California Desert Protection Act of 1994

Passed House
Last Action: Jul 27, 1994

 
Full Title

To provide for the protection of the Bodie Bowl area of the State of California, and for other purposes.

Summary

No summaries available.

 
Cosponsors
2 cosponsors (2D) (show)
Committees

House Natural Resources

Energy and Mineral Resources

Senate Energy and Natural Resources

National Parks

The committee chair determines whether a bill will move past the committee stage.

 
Primary Source

THOMAS.gov (The Library of Congress)

GovTrack gets most information from THOMAS, which is updated generally one day after events occur. Activity since the last update may not be reflected here. Data comes via the congress project.

Widget

Get a bill status widget for your website »

Citation

Click a format for a citation suggestion:

Notes

H.R. stands for House of Representatives bill.

A bill must be passed by both the House and Senate in identical form and then be signed by the president to become law.

The bill’s title was written by its sponsor.

GovTrack’s Bill Summary

We don’t have a summary available yet.

Library of Congress Summary

The summary below was written by the Congressional Research Service, which is a nonpartisan division of the Library of Congress.


5/11/1993--Passed House amended.
Bodie Protection Act of 1993 - Prohibits the Bodie Bowl (California) from being available for any mineral mining, leasing, or disposal activities, except under valid existing claims.
Directs the Secretary of the Interior to undertake an expedited validity review of all unpatented mining claims located within the Bodie Bowl. Prescribes limitations for the issuance of patents for mining and mill site claims on such lands.
Directs the Secretary to require that mineral activities be conducted in the Bodie Bowl so as to:
(1) avoid adverse effects on the historic, cultural, recreational, and natural resource values of the Bowl; and
(2) minimize other adverse impacts to the environment.
Mandates reclamation of the effects of mining exploration by mining operators.
Exempts the holder of any unpatented mining or mill site claim within the Bodie Bowl from specified statutory expenditure and filing requirements.
Declares that, in lieu of filing a certain affidavit of assessment work, such holder shall only be required to file a specified notice of intention to hold certain mining claims.
Directs the Secretary to:
(1) review possible actions to preserve specified characteristics of the Bodie Bowl; and
(2) report to certain congressional committees recommendations to achieve such preservation.

House Republican Conference Summary

The summary below was written by the House Republican Conference, which is the caucus of Republicans in the House of Representatives.


No summary available.

House Democratic Caucus Summary

The House Democratic Caucus does not provide summaries of bills.

So, yes, we display the House Republican Conference’s summaries when available even if we do not have a Democratic summary available. That’s because we feel it is better to give you as much information as possible, even if we cannot provide every viewpoint.

We’ll be looking for a source of summaries from the other side in the meanwhile.

Use the comment space below for discussion of the merits of H.R. 240 (103rd) with other GovTrack users.
Your comments are not read by Congressional staff.

comments powered by Disqus