H.R. 4206 (103rd): GATT Fair Trade Enforcement Act of 1994

Introduced:
Apr 13, 1994 (103rd Congress, 1993–1994)
Status:
Died (Referred to Committee)
Sponsor
Ralph Regula
Representative for Ohio's 16th congressional district
Party
Republican
Text
Read Text »
Last Updated
Apr 13, 1994
Length
91 pages
Related Bills
H.R. 5110 (Related)
Uruguay Round Agreements Act

Signed by the President
Dec 08, 1994

 
Status

This bill was introduced on April 13, 1994, in a previous session of Congress, but was not enacted.

Progress
Introduced Apr 13, 1994
Referred to Committee Apr 13, 1994
 
Full Title

To provide for the implementation of the Uruguay Round of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade concerning specific code section, and for other purposes.

Summary

No summaries available.

Cosponsors
28 cosponsors (23D, 5R) (show)
Committees

House Foreign Affairs

House Rules

House Judiciary

Courts, Intellectual Property, and the Internet

House Ways and Means

The committee chair determines whether a bill will move past the committee stage.

 
Primary Source

THOMAS.gov (The Library of Congress)

GovTrack gets most information from THOMAS, which is updated generally one day after events occur. Activity since the last update may not be reflected here. Data comes via the congress project.

Widget

Get a bill status widget for your website »

Citation

Click a format for a citation suggestion:

Notes

H.R. stands for House of Representatives bill.

A bill must be passed by both the House and Senate in identical form and then be signed by the president to become law.

The bill’s title was written by its sponsor.

GovTrack’s Bill Summary

We don’t have a summary available yet.

Library of Congress Summary

The summary below was written by the Congressional Research Service, which is a nonpartisan division of the Library of Congress.


4/13/1994--Introduced.
TABLE OF CONTENTS:
Title I - Countervailing and Antidumping Duty Amendments Title II: Intellectual Property Amendments Title III: Market Opening Measures GATT Fair Trade Enforcement Act of 1994
Title I - Countervailing and Antidumping Duty Amendments
Amends the Tariff Act of 1930 to require every importer of record making an entry of merchandise to declare: (1) whether such merchandise is subject to any antidumping or countervailing duty order; and (2) whether the importer disclosed to the manufacturer of such merchandise in the country of exportation that its destination is the United States.
Section 101 -
Requires such importer with respect to merchandise subject to an antidumping duty order to disclose to the manufacturer that such merchandise has been purchased for exportation to the United States, unless at the time of purchase, the importer did not:
(1) intend to export the merchandise to the United States;
(2) import it for a period of at least six months from the date of purchase; and
(3) regularly engage in a pattern of importation of such merchandise.
Subjects importers who fail to make such disclosures to Federal prosecution.
Section 102 -
Sets forth an alternative method for determining the exporter's sales price.
Section 103 -
Directs the International Trade Commission (ITC), with respect to the award of compensation, to forward to the Commissioner of the United States Customs Service within 60 days of the issuance of an antidumping or countervailing duty order a list of petitioners and companies that support the petition with respect to the dollar value of their shipments during the last year covered by the original ITC investigation.
Requires the Secretary of the Treasury (Secretary) to establish a special compensation account composed of all antidumping or countervailing duties, including interest, that are collected under a antidumping or countervailing duty order.
Section 104 -
Declares that diversionary input dumping occurs when:
(1) a manufacturer incorporates into merchandise under investigation a component which is the subject of an antidumping duty order, a finding issued under the Antidumping Act, 1921, or an international agreement or agreement to eliminate the injurious effect of imports that is entered into after an affirmative preliminary determination with respect to antidumping; and
(2) such manufacturer under investigation purchased such component at a price which is less than the foreign market value.
Requires the administering authority to commence an antidumping investigation whenever it has reasonable grounds to believe that:
(1) diversionary input dumping is occurring;
(2) it has a significant effect on the cost of producing the merchandise under investigation; and
(3) subsequent to the imposition of an antidumping duty order or entry into force of an agreement relating to the components in question, U.S.-bound shipments of the merchandise under investigation have increased.
Provides for extension of the period of time for preliminary determinations of diversionary input dumping by the administering authority.
Section 105 -
Requires the administering authority to decide that a competitive benefit has been bestowed when the price for the input product is lower than the price that the manufacturer of merchandise which is the subject of a countervailing duty proceeding would otherwise pay for the product in obtaining it from an unsubsidized seller (currently any seller) in an arms-length transaction. Sets forth specified factors to be considered in the determination of such price.
Section 106 -
Revises the method by which the administering authority determines the foreign market value of dumped merchandise with respect to their sale at less than the cost of production in their home market.
Section 107 -
Requires the administering authority, when determining whether imported parts or components are circumventing an antidumping or countervailing duty order or finding, and whether to include such parts or components in such order or finding, to consider, among other things, the value and sources of supply parts or components historically used in completion or assembly of the merchandise subject to such order.
Authorizes the administering authority to include within the scope of such order or finding imported parts or components used in the completion or assembly of certain merchandise sold in the United States and subject to such order or finding, provided:
(1) such merchandise is completed or assembled in the United States or a foreign country from parts or components supplied by the exporter or producer with respect to which such order or finding applies, from suppliers that have historically supplied the parts or components to that exporter or producer, or from any party in the exporting country supplying parts or components on behalf of such exporter or producer;
(2) the difference between the value of such imported parts and components and the total value of all parts or components used in the assembly or completion operation, excluding packing, is significant; and
(3) consideration of specified factors established a pattern of circumvention of such order or finding.
Section 108 -
Declares that if an antidumping duty petition alleges its petitioning members of the domestic industry account for 25 percent or more of the total production of the like product produced by it, the administering authority shall not be required to further investigate the standing of such petitioners unless a written objection to initiation is filed by a member of the domestic industry.
Section 109 -
Revises, for purposes of determining the foreign market value of imported merchandise, the method for calculating its constructed value.
Section 110 -
Revises provisions regarding the: (1) administrative review, and period of time for review, of quantitative import restriction agreements and antidumping duty or countervailing duty orders or findings; (2) revocation of such orders or findings; and (3) termination of suspended antidumping duty or countervailing duty investigations.
Section 111 -
Revises provisions regarding:
(1) foreign market value determinations with respect to imported merchandise to include the effects of fluctuations in currency exchange rates;
(2) sampling and averaging in determining the U.S. price or foreign market value of imported merchandise;
(3) market viability as it relates to foreign market value determinations;
(4) negligible imports as they affect material injury determinations;
(5) captive production as it relates to defining the domestic industry; and
(6) adjustments to the calculation of the exporter's sales price of merchandise.
Title II - Intellectual Property Amendments
Amends the Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988 to revise and specify new U.S. objectives with respect to the international protection of intellectual property rights.
Section 202 -
Prohibits the President from negotiating any new free trade agreement with a foreign country, unless such country:
(1) has substantially implemented the Uruguay Round Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS); and
(2) expresses willingness to negotiate an agreement with the United States to provide intellectual property protection equivalent to that set forth in the Model Intellectual Property Agreement. Requires the President to amend existing free trade agreements to provide greater protection of such rights.
Prohibits fast track procedures from applying to any implementing legislation of a free trade agreement if the above-mentioned requirements are not met.
Section 203 -
Amends the Trade Act of 1974 to require the United States Trade Representative (USTR), among other things, to identify those foreign countries that deny non-discriminatory market access opportunities for U.S. persons, including access related to any exploitation or enjoyment of commercial benefits from exercising rights in protected works, fixations, or products embodying protected works.
Sets forth additional factors the USTR must take into account in identifying a priority foreign country.
Revises provisions regarding a foreign country's denial of:
(1) adequate protection of intellectual property rights; and
(2) fair market access.
Specifies when a foreign country denies non-discriminatory market access opportunities for U.S. persons in respect of establishing business operations or any use, benefit, or exploitation of protected works, fixations, or products embodying protected rights.
Section 204 -
Amends the Tariff Act of 1930 to make it unlawful for an owner, distributor, or consignee to sell articles, including semiconductor chip products, in the United States that: (1) infringe a valid U.S. patent or copyright; (2) are made or mined by means of a process covered by a valid U.S. patent; (3) infringe a valid U.S. trademark; and (4) infringe a mask work. Requires the Secretary of Commerce to investigate any violations committed under this Act. Sets forth civil penalties.
Section 205 -
Amends the Trade Act of 1974 to prohibit the President, one year after the effective date of the Uruguay Round Agreement establishing the World Trade Organization, from designating any country a beneficiary developing country if it has not implemented the TRIPS. Authorizes the President to designate:
(1) a least developed country a beneficiary developing country for four additional years; and
(2) a non-least developed country certified to the Congress to be making significant progress toward implementation of TRIPS a beneficiary developing country for one additional year.
Section 206 -
Requires the USTR to: (1) maintain a Model Intellectual Property Agreement that embodies provisions for intellectual property protection that strengthen the standards contained in TRIPS and the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA); and (2) review periodically the Model Intellectual Property Agreement to ensure it reflects new developments in intellectual property protection and new technologies.
Section 207 -
Requires the Secretary of State to instruct all heads of U.S. diplomatic missions abroad to include intellectual property protection as a priority objective of the mission.
Section 208 -
Requires the USTR to develop a procedure to ensure the exchange of information between interested U.S. private sector representatives and the USTR in preparation for international intellectual property-related dispute settlement proceedings to which the United States is a party.
Section 209 -
Authorizes the President to undertake specified actions with respect to developing countries to encourage them to improve their protection of intellectual property.
Section 210 -
Urges the USTR to negotiate with foreign countries the implementation of the border enforcement provisions against the importation of infringing goods enumerated in TRIPS, and if warranted, require those countries that chronically violate intellectual property rights to establish an export control monitoring system.
Title III - Market Opening Measures
Amends the Trade Act of 1974 to authorize the President to impose civil penalties on foreign or domestic persons that engage in restrictive business practices, including price-fixing, bid-rigging, joint restraint of output, market allocation, boycotts, tying arrangements, or similar activities, when such practices foreclose U.S. exports or burden or restrict U.S. foreign commerce.
Authorizes the President to negotiate settlement agreements with parties or governments which result in the elimination of:
(1) the practice under investigation; or
(2) the restriction on U.S. exports or the burden or restriction on U.S. commerce.
Provides for the imposition of civil penalties.
Section 302 -
Authorizes the President to take trade action with respect to any area pertinent to relations with a foreign country that is that target of such action, including but not limited to, trade in any goods or services.
Declares unreasonable any act, policy, or practice which denies fair and equitable provision of adequate and effective protection of intellectual property rights, notwithstanding that the foreign country may have implemented TRIPS or any other bilateral, regional, or multilateral agreement with respect to intellectual property protection.
Requires the USTR to initiate an investigation whenever a petition alleges that:
(1) a foreign country fails to provide adequate and effective protection of intellectual property rights; and
(2) acts, policies, or practices of the country either deny benefits to the United States under a trade agreement, or burden or restrict U.S. commerce.
Section 303 -
Expresses the sense of the Congress that every effort be taken to conclude the Multilateral Steel Agreement (MSA) before implementation of the Uruguay Round of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT). Declares that a principal U.S. negotiating objective in the MSA shall be to obtain rules ensuring the elimination of all injurious subsidies.
Requires, prior to implementation of GATT, that U.S. negotiators consider the potential impact the elimination of tariffs on specialty steel products would have on the specialty steel industry absent a successful conclusion of the MSA.

House Republican Conference Summary

The summary below was written by the House Republican Conference, which is the caucus of Republicans in the House of Representatives.


No summary available.

House Democratic Caucus Summary

The House Democratic Caucus does not provide summaries of bills.

So, yes, we display the House Republican Conference’s summaries when available even if we do not have a Democratic summary available. That’s because we feel it is better to give you as much information as possible, even if we cannot provide every viewpoint.

We’ll be looking for a source of summaries from the other side in the meanwhile.

Use the comment space below for discussion of the merits of H.R. 4206 (103rd) with other GovTrack users.
Your comments are not read by Congressional staff.

comments powered by Disqus