S. 622 (103rd): A bill to authorize appropriations for the United States Office of Special Counsel, the Merit Systems Protection Board, and for other purposes.

Introduced:
Mar 19, 1993 (103rd Congress, 1993–1994)
Status:
Died (Passed Senate)
Sponsor
Carl Levin
Senator from Michigan
Party
Democrat
Text
Read Text »
Last Updated
Oct 03, 1994
Length
18 pages
Related Bills
H.R. 2970 (Related)
An Act to authorize appropriations for the United States Office of Special Counsel, the ...

Signed by the President
Oct 29, 1994

 
Status

This bill was introduced in a previous session of Congress and was passed by the Senate on October 3, 1994 but was never passed by the House.

Progress
Introduced Mar 19, 1993
Referred to Committee Mar 19, 1993
Reported by Committee Apr 26, 1994
Passed Senate Oct 03, 1994
 
Summary

No summaries available.

Cosponsors
2 cosponsors (1D, 1R) (show)
Committees

Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

The committee chair determines whether a bill will move past the committee stage.

 
Primary Source

THOMAS.gov (The Library of Congress)

GovTrack gets most information from THOMAS, which is updated generally one day after events occur. Activity since the last update may not be reflected here. Data comes via the congress project.

Widget

Get a bill status widget for your website »

Citation

Click a format for a citation suggestion:

Notes

S. stands for Senate bill.

A bill must be passed by both the House and Senate in identical form and then be signed by the president to become law.

The bill’s title was written by its sponsor.

GovTrack’s Bill Summary

We don’t have a summary available yet.

Library of Congress Summary

The summary below was written by the Congressional Research Service, which is a nonpartisan division of the Library of Congress.


10/3/1994--Passed Senate amended.
Amends the Whistleblower Protection Act of 1989 (WPA) to extend the authorization of appropriations for the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) and the Office of Special Counsel (OSC). Makes numerous miscellaneous and technical amendments to various OSC provisions under WPA, including those regarding OSC administration and powers of disclosure, investigation of prohibited personnel practices and individual rights of action in certain reprisal cases, and OSC reports.
Amends Federal law to:
(1) make an agency decision to order psychiatric testing or examination of an employee, as well as any other significant change in duties, responsibilities, or working conditions, a personnel action subject to review in whistleblower cases;
(2) extend protection against certain prohibited personnel practices to employees of Government corporations;
(3) make agency and Government corporation heads responsible for ensuring that their employees are informed of the rights and remedies available under Federal law for whistleblowers;
(4) make compliance with merit systems principles a factor in Senior Executive Service performance appraisals;
(5) revise the definition of covered position with respect to prohibited personnel practices;
(6) permit reasonable attorney's fees in certain cases;
(7) allow Federal employees to use circumstantial evidence in seeking to obtain corrective actions;
(8) extend whistleblower protection coverage to certain Department of Veterans Affairs personnel;
(9) allow the Board to order corrective action that will make the employee whole; and
(10) give the MSPB the authorization to receive reimbursement, subject to congressional limitation, from the Civil Service Retirement and Disability Fund for expenses incurred in administering Federal retirement appeals.
Requires OSC to:
(1) issue a policy statement regarding the implementation of WPA;
(2) include in any letter terminating an investigation of a prohibited personnel practice the identification of an OSC employee who can respond to questions on the investigations; and
(3) conduct an annual survey of all individuals who contact it for assistance.
Gives employees of the Resolution Trust Corporation and Thrift Depositor Protection Oversight Board the option of electing which laws to apply in pursuing remedies in Whistleblower cases.

House Republican Conference Summary

The summary below was written by the House Republican Conference, which is the caucus of Republicans in the House of Representatives.


No summary available.

House Democratic Caucus Summary

The House Democratic Caucus does not provide summaries of bills.

So, yes, we display the House Republican Conference’s summaries when available even if we do not have a Democratic summary available. That’s because we feel it is better to give you as much information as possible, even if we cannot provide every viewpoint.

We’ll be looking for a source of summaries from the other side in the meanwhile.

Use the comment space below for discussion of the merits of S. 622 (103rd) with other GovTrack users.
Your comments are not read by Congressional staff.

comments powered by Disqus