H.R. 2740 (104th): Fan Freedom and Community Protection Act of 1996

Introduced:
Dec 07, 1995 (104th Congress, 1995–1996)
Status:
Died (Reported by Committee)
Sponsor
Martin Hoke
Representative for Ohio's 10th congressional district
Party
Republican
Text
Read Text »
Last Updated
Dec 07, 1995
Length
14 pages
Related Bills
H.R. 2699 (Related)
Fans Rights Act of 1995

Referred to Committee
Last Action: Nov 30, 1995

 
Status

This bill was introduced on April 25, 1996, in a previous session of Congress, but was not enacted.

Progress
Introduced Dec 07, 1995
Referred to Committee Dec 07, 1995
Reported by Committee Apr 25, 1996
 
Full Title

To protect sports fans and communities throughout the Nation, and for other purposes.

Summary

No summaries available.

Cosponsors
50 cosponsors (39R, 11D) (show)
Committees

House Energy and Commerce

House Judiciary

The committee chair determines whether a bill will move past the committee stage.

 
Primary Source

THOMAS.gov (The Library of Congress)

GovTrack gets most information from THOMAS, which is updated generally one day after events occur. Activity since the last update may not be reflected here. Data comes via the congress project.

Widget

Get a bill status widget for your website »

Citation

Click a format for a citation suggestion:

Notes

H.R. stands for House of Representatives bill.

A bill must be passed by both the House and Senate in identical form and then be signed by the president to become law.

The bill’s title was written by its sponsor.

GovTrack’s Bill Summary

We don’t have a summary available yet.

Library of Congress Summary

The summary below was written by the Congressional Research Service, which is a nonpartisan division of the Library of Congress.


6/27/1996--Reported to House amended, Part I.
Fan Freedom and Community Protection Act of 1996 - Requires a professional sports team owner seeking to relocate the team to provide notice to the local government for the community in which the team's stadium or arena is located (home community), the sports authority with jurisdiction over the stadium or facility, any owner or operator of such stadium or facility, and the professional sports league concerned and each member team.
Requires such notice to:
(1) be delivered in person or by certified mail and published in one or more newspapers of general circulation within the home community; and
(2) include the proposed new location, a summary of the reasons for moving, and the date on which the change is scheduled to become effective.
Section 4 -
Directs a league, within a year after the submission of the name of an investor, to grant to the investor a new expansion team franchise at a fee no greater, and on terms and conditions no less favorable, than those granted to the last expansion team franchise granted.
Authorizes the league, for ten years after granting an expansion team franchise, to approve a resale of the team but not the team's relocation, except as provided herein.
Makes this section inapplicable to a team that relocates within 25 miles of the home community and remains within the State in which the home community is located.
Section 5 -
Permits, under the antitrust laws, a league to enforce rules or agreements authorizing its membership to decide whether a member team may relocate.
Requires a league, in determining whether to approve such relocation, to make specific written findings, including findings regarding fan loyalty and the extent to which the team received public financial support.
Specifies that no decision by a league to permit a relocation shall be valid or final until the league has:
(1) conducted at least two public hearings in the home community;
(2) permitted any interested member of the public to deliver oral, or file written, comments;
(3) published written findings in a local home community newspaper setting forth the basis of such decision; and
(4) delivered copies of such findings to the local government of the home community and any sports authority.
Section 6 -
Requires (except where recovery of financial assistance is a remedy under the contract) an owner who relocates a team from one playing facility to another and who, in so doing, breaches a contract with the State or local government to pay to such government the value of financial assistance provided by the State or local government to the team.
Makes a team owner who violates the requirement of this section liable to the State or local government that provided financial assistance to the team for an amount equal to three times the value of the assistance provided.
Section 7 -
Makes a league that violates the requirement to grant a new team franchise:
(1) liable to the home community in which a team was previously located for damages of three times the purchase price or market value of the team, whichever is greater;
(2) subject to the suspension for one season of its antitrust exemption for pooling the broadcasting rights to games; and
(3) subject to the loss of the antitrust exemption under this Act for the franchise relocation that led to the violation.
Sets forth enforcement provisions.

House Republican Conference Summary

The summary below was written by the House Republican Conference, which is the caucus of Republicans in the House of Representatives.


No summary available.

House Democratic Caucus Summary

The House Democratic Caucus does not provide summaries of bills.

So, yes, we display the House Republican Conference’s summaries when available even if we do not have a Democratic summary available. That’s because we feel it is better to give you as much information as possible, even if we cannot provide every viewpoint.

We’ll be looking for a source of summaries from the other side in the meanwhile.

Use the comment space below for discussion of the merits of H.R. 2740 (104th) with other GovTrack users.
Your comments are not read by Congressional staff.

comments powered by Disqus