H.R. 4224 (104th): To provide for a 3-judge division of the court to determine whether cases alleging breach of secret Government contracts should be tried in court.

Introduced:
Sep 26, 1996 (104th Congress, 1995–1996)
Status:
Died (Referred to Committee)
Sponsor
James Traficant Jr.
Representative for Ohio's 17th congressional district
Party
Democrat
Text
Read Text »
Last Updated
Sep 26, 1996
Length
4 pages
Related Bills
H.R. 691 (105th) was a re-introduction of this bill in a later Congress.

Referred to Committee
Last Action: Feb 11, 1997

S. 994 (Related)
A bill to amend title 38, United States Code, to clarify the eligibility of ...

Reported by Committee
Last Action: Jul 24, 1996

 
Status

This bill was introduced on September 26, 1996, in a previous session of Congress, but was not enacted.

Progress
Introduced Sep 26, 1996
Referred to Committee Sep 26, 1996
 
Summary

No summaries available.

Cosponsors
1 cosponsors (1R) (show)
Committees

House Judiciary

The committee chair determines whether a bill will move past the committee stage.

 
Primary Source

THOMAS.gov (The Library of Congress)

GovTrack gets most information from THOMAS, which is updated generally one day after events occur. Activity since the last update may not be reflected here. Data comes via the congress project.

Widget

Get a bill status widget for your website »

Citation

Click a format for a citation suggestion:

Notes

H.R. stands for House of Representatives bill.

A bill must be passed by both the House and Senate in identical form and then be signed by the president to become law.

The bill’s title was written by its sponsor.

GovTrack’s Bill Summary

We don’t have a summary available yet.

Library of Congress Summary

The summary below was written by the Congressional Research Service, which is a nonpartisan division of the Library of Congress.


9/26/1996--Introduced.
Directs the Chief Justice of the United States to assign three circuit court judges or justices (which may include senior judges or retired justices) to a division of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia to determine whether suits brought by persons, including foreign nationals, in Federal court for compensation for services performed for the United States pursuant to a secret Government contract may be tried by the court.
Requires such division to determine whether the information that would be disclosed in adjudicating the action would do serious damage to U.S. national security or would compromise the safety and security of intelligence sources inside or outside the United States. Authorizes such division, if it determines that the case may be heard, to prescribe steps that the court shall take to protect national security and intelligence sources and methods.
Sets forth provisions regarding:
(1) assignment and terms;
(2) case referrals;
(3) effect of the division's determinations;
(4) other judicial assignments;
(5) vacancies; and
(6) support services.
Makes this Act applicable to claims arising on or after December 1, 1976.

House Republican Conference Summary

The summary below was written by the House Republican Conference, which is the caucus of Republicans in the House of Representatives.


No summary available.

House Democratic Caucus Summary

The House Democratic Caucus does not provide summaries of bills.

So, yes, we display the House Republican Conference’s summaries when available even if we do not have a Democratic summary available. That’s because we feel it is better to give you as much information as possible, even if we cannot provide every viewpoint.

We’ll be looking for a source of summaries from the other side in the meanwhile.

Use the comment space below for discussion of the merits of H.R. 4224 (104th) with other GovTrack users.
Your comments are not read by Congressional staff.

comments powered by Disqus