H.R. 926 (104th): Regulatory Reform and Relief Act

Introduced:
Feb 14, 1995 (104th Congress, 1995–1996)
Status:
Died (Passed House)
Sponsor
George Gekas
Representative for Pennsylvania's 17th congressional district
Party
Republican
Text
Read Text »
Last Updated
Mar 03, 1995
Length
18 pages
Related Bills
H.R. 3136 (Related)
Contract with America Advancement Act of 1996

Signed by the President
Mar 29, 1996

S. 343 (Related)
Comprehensive Regulatory Reform Act of 1995

Reported by Committee
Last Action: Mar 23, 1995

 
Status

This bill was introduced in a previous session of Congress and was passed by the House on March 1, 1995 but was never passed by the Senate.

Progress
Introduced Feb 14, 1995
Referred to Committee Feb 14, 1995
Reported by Committee Feb 16, 1995
Passed House Mar 01, 1995
 
Full Title

To promote regulatory flexibility and enhance public participation in Federal agency rulemaking and for other purposes.

Summary

No summaries available.

Votes
Mar 01, 1995 2:10 p.m.
Agreed to 420/5
Mar 01, 1995 4:44 p.m.
Failed 159/266
Mar 01, 1995 5:19 p.m.
Agreed to 406/23
Mar 01, 1995 5:58 p.m.
Passed 415/15

Cosponsors
1 cosponsors (1R) (show)
Committees

House Judiciary

Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

The committee chair determines whether a bill will move past the committee stage.

 
Primary Source

THOMAS.gov (The Library of Congress)

GovTrack gets most information from THOMAS, which is updated generally one day after events occur. Activity since the last update may not be reflected here. Data comes via the congress project.

Widget

Get a bill status widget for your website »

Citation

Click a format for a citation suggestion:

Notes

H.R. stands for House of Representatives bill.

A bill must be passed by both the House and Senate in identical form and then be signed by the president to become law.

The bill’s title was written by its sponsor.

GovTrack’s Bill Summary

We don’t have a summary available yet.

Library of Congress Summary

The summary below was written by the Congressional Research Service, which is a nonpartisan division of the Library of Congress.


3/1/1995--Passed House amended.
TABLE OF CONTENTS:
Title I - Strengthening Regulatory Flexibility Title II: Regulatory Impact Analyses Title III: Protections Regulatory Reform and Relief Act
Title I - Strengthening Regulatory Flexibility
Amends Federal civil service law to revise Federal provisions regarding judicial review of regulatory flexibility analyses.
Section 101 -
Authorizes an affected small entity to petition for judicial review within one year after the effective date of a final rule which an agency certified would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities or for which an agency prepared a final regulatory flexibility analysis.
Requires that, where an agency delays the issuance of a final regulatory flexibility analysis, a petition for judicial review shall be filed not later than one year after the analysis is made available to the public.
Authorizes the court, where the agency:
(1) certified that such rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities, to order the agency to prepare a final regulatory flexibility analysis if the court determines that the certification was arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law; and
(2) prepared a final regulatory flexibility analysis, to order the agency to take corrective action if the court determines that the analysis was prepared without observance of proper procedure.
Authorizes the court to stay the rule or grant such other relief as appropriate, if by 90 days after the court order (or such longer period as the court may provide) the agency fails to prepare the required analysis or to take corrective action.
Section 102 -
Sets forth guidelines governing agency transmittal of proposed rules and initial regulatory flexibility analysis to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration. Authorizes such official to transmit to the agency a statement of the effect of the proposed rule on small entities.
Requires publication of such statement and the agency's response in the Federal Register. Exempts from such requirements proposed rules issued by an appropriate Federal banking agency, the National Credit Union Administration, or the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight relating to the implementation of monetary policy or the safety and soundness of certain federally insured banking institutions or government sponsored housing enterprises.
Section 103 -
Expresses the sense of the Congress that such official should be permitted to appear as amicus curiae in any action or case brought in a U.S. court for the purpose of reviewing a rule.
Title II - Regulatory Impact Analyses
Amends the Administrative Procedure Act to define a major rule as one likely to result in: (1) an annual effect on the economy of $50 million or more; (2) a major increase in costs or prices for consumers, individual industries, government agencies, or geographic regions; or (3) significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or on the ability of U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises in domestic and export markets.
Section 202 -
Requires publication in the Federal Register of notices of intent to engage in major rulemaking at least 90 days before publication of the general notice.
Section 203 -
Requires a hearing for any major proposed rule, and an extension of the comment period, if more than 100 interested persons acting individually request such things.
Section 204 -
Requires each agency to prepare a regulatory impact analysis for each major rule promulgated by the agency. Prohibits an agency from adopting a major rule unless the final regulatory impact analysis for the rule is approved or commented upon by the Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
Section 205 -
Requires the head of an agency, to the extent practicable, to seek to ensure that any proposed major rule or regulatory impact analysis of such a rule is written in a reasonably simple and understandable manner and provides adequate notice of the content of the rule to affected persons.
Section 206 -
Exempts from certain rulemaking requirements of such Act certain regulations:
(1) pertaining to emergency situations;
(2) for which consideration under such Act would conflict with deadlines imposed by statute or by judicial order;
(3) connected with implementation of monetary policy or the safety and soundness of certain federally insured banking institutions or government sponsored housing enterprises; and
(4) connected with imposition of trade sanctions against any country engaging in illegal trade activities injurious to U.S. technology, jobs, pensions, or general economic well-being.
Exempts also from such rulemaking requirements any agency action limited to interpreting, implementing, or administering U.S. internal revenue laws.
Section 207 -
Requires the OMB Director to report to the Congress an analysis of rulemaking procedures of Federal agencies and an analysis of the impact of those procedures on the regulated public and regulatory process.
Title III - Protections
Directs the President to prescribe regulations for employees of the executive branch to ensure that Federal laws and regulations shall be administered consistent with the principle that any person shall, in connection with the enforcement of such laws and regulations, be protected from abuse, reprisal, or retaliation, and be treated fairly, equitably, and with due regard for such person's rights under the Constitution.

House Republican Conference Summary

The summary below was written by the House Republican Conference, which is the caucus of Republicans in the House of Representatives.


No summary available.

House Democratic Caucus Summary

The House Democratic Caucus does not provide summaries of bills.

So, yes, we display the House Republican Conference’s summaries when available even if we do not have a Democratic summary available. That’s because we feel it is better to give you as much information as possible, even if we cannot provide every viewpoint.

We’ll be looking for a source of summaries from the other side in the meanwhile.

Use the comment space below for discussion of the merits of H.R. 926 (104th) with other GovTrack users.
Your comments are not read by Congressional staff.

comments powered by Disqus