S. 1627 (104th): A bill to designate the visitor center at Jean Lafitte National Historical Park in New Orleans, Louisiana as the “Laura C. Hudson Visitor Center.”

Mar 20, 1996 (104th Congress, 1995–1996)
Died (Reported by Committee)
John Johnston Jr.
Senator from Louisiana
Read Text »
Last Updated
May 09, 1996
4 pages

This bill was introduced on May 1, 1996, in a previous session of Congress, but was not enacted.

Introduced Mar 20, 1996
Referred to Committee Mar 20, 1996
Reported by Committee May 01, 1996

No summaries available.

2 cosponsors (2D) (show)

Senate Energy and Natural Resources

National Parks

The committee chair determines whether a bill will move past the committee stage.

Primary Source

THOMAS.gov (The Library of Congress)

GovTrack gets most information from THOMAS, which is updated generally one day after events occur. Activity since the last update may not be reflected here. Data comes via the congress project.


Get a bill status widget for your website »


Click a format for a citation suggestion:


S. stands for Senate bill.

A bill must be passed by both the House and Senate in identical form and then be signed by the president to become law.

The bill’s title was written by its sponsor.

GovTrack’s Bill Summary

We don’t have a summary available yet.

Library of Congress Summary

The summary below was written by the Congressional Research Service, which is a nonpartisan division of the Library of Congress.

Designates the visitor center at Jean Lafitte National Historical Park located at 419 Rue Decatur in New Orleans, Louisiana, as the Laura C. Hudson Visitor Center.

House Republican Conference Summary

The summary below was written by the House Republican Conference, which is the caucus of Republicans in the House of Representatives.

No summary available.

House Democratic Caucus Summary

The House Democratic Caucus does not provide summaries of bills.

So, yes, we display the House Republican Conference’s summaries when available even if we do not have a Democratic summary available. That’s because we feel it is better to give you as much information as possible, even if we cannot provide every viewpoint.

We’ll be looking for a source of summaries from the other side in the meanwhile.

Use the comment space below for discussion of the merits of S. 1627 (104th) with other GovTrack users.
Your comments are not read by Congressional staff.

comments powered by Disqus