H.R. 125 (105th): To make clear that the definition of a base period, under the unemployment compensation law of a State, is not an administrative provision subject to section 303(a)(1) of the Social Security Act.

Introduced:

Jan 7, 1997
105th Congress, 1997–1998

Status:
Died in a previous Congress

This bill was introduced on January 7, 1997, in a previous session of Congress, but was not enacted.

Sponsor:

Philip “Phil” Crane

Representative for Illinois's 8th congressional district

Republican

Text:

Read Text »
Last Updated: Jan 7, 1997
Length: 2 pages

About the bill

Summary (CRS)
1/7/1997--Introduced.Declares that no provision of State (unemployment compensation) law under which the State's base period is defined or otherwise determined shall be considered a provision for a method of administration ... Read more >
Related Bills

Legislative action may be ocurring on one of these bills in lieu of or in parallel to action on this bill.

H.R. 2015 (Related)
Balanced Budget Act of 1997

Enacted — Signed by the President
Aug 5, 1997

What is a bill?

The “H.R.” in “H.R. 125” means this is a House of Representatives bill in the United States Congress. A bill must be passed by both the House and Senate in identical form and then be signed by the President to become law.

The bill’s title was written by its sponsor.

History

Introduced
Jan 7, 1997

Details

Cosponsors
15 cosponsors (14R, 1D) (show)
Committee Assignments

The committee chair determines whether a bill will move past the committee stage.

Votes

There have been no votes related to this bill.

Find Similar Bills

Search for similar bills.

Links & tools

Primary Source

THOMAS.gov (The Library of Congress)

GovTrack gets most information from THOMAS, which is updated generally one day after events occur. Activity since the last update may not be reflected here. Data comes via the congress project.

Citation

Click a format for a citation suggestion: