H.R. 3396 (105th): Citizens Protection Act of 1998

Introduced:
Mar 05, 1998 (105th Congress, 1997–1998)
Status:
Died (Referred to Committee)
Sponsor
Joseph McDade
Representative for Pennsylvania's 10th congressional district
Party
Republican
Text
Read Text »
Last Updated
Mar 05, 1998
Length
11 pages
 
Status

This bill was introduced on March 5, 1998, in a previous session of Congress, but was not enacted.

Progress
Introduced Mar 05, 1998
Referred to Committee Mar 05, 1998
 
Full Title

To establish standards of conduct for Department of Justice employees, and to establish a review board to monitor compliance with such standards.

Summary

No summaries available.

Cosponsors
195 cosponsors (122R, 72D, 1D) (show)
Committees

House Judiciary

Commercial and Administrative Law

The committee chair determines whether a bill will move past the committee stage.

 
Primary Source

THOMAS.gov (The Library of Congress)

GovTrack gets most information from THOMAS, which is updated generally one day after events occur. Activity since the last update may not be reflected here. Data comes via the congress project.

Widget

Get a bill status widget for your website »

Citation

Click a format for a citation suggestion:

Notes

H.R. stands for House of Representatives bill.

A bill must be passed by both the House and Senate in identical form and then be signed by the president to become law.

The bill’s title was written by its sponsor.

GovTrack’s Bill Summary

We don’t have a summary available yet.

Library of Congress Summary

The summary below was written by the Congressional Research Service, which is a nonpartisan division of the Library of Congress.


3/5/1998--Introduced.
TABLE OF CONTENTS:
Title I - Ethical Standards for Federal Prosecutors Title II: Punishable Conduct Citizens Protection Act of 1998
Title I - Ethical Standards for Federal Prosecutors
Subjects a Government attorney to State laws and rules, and local Federal court rules, governing attorneys in each State where such attorney engages in duties to the same extent and in the same manner as other attorneys in that State. Directs the Attorney General to make and amend rules of the Department of Justice (DOJ) to assure compliance with this title.
Title II - Punishable Conduct
Directs the Attorney General to:
(1) establish by rule that it shall be punishable conduct for any DOJ employee to seek an indictment in the absence of probable cause, to fail promptly to release information that would exonerate a person under indictment, to intentionally or knowingly misstate or alter evidence, to attempt to influence or color a witness's testimony, to act to frustrate or impede a defendant's right to discovery, to offer or provide sexual activities to any government witness or potential witness, to leak or otherwise improperly disseminate information to any person during an investigation, or to engage in conduct that discredits DOJ; and
(2) establish penalties for engaging in such conduct, including probation, demotion, dismissal, referral of ethical charges to the bar, loss of pension or other retirement benefits, suspension from employment, and referral of the allegations (if appropriate) to a grand jury for possible criminal prosecution.
Section 202 -
Sets forth procedures regarding written complaints of such conduct by a DOJ employee, investigation of such complaints by the Attorney General, and imposition of appropriate penalties.
Section 203 -
Establishes an independent Misconduct Review Board to review all determinations by the Attorney General with respect to such complaints and to investigate allegations made in statements that may be submitted to it with respect to complaints for which the Attorney General has made no determination or imposed no penalty. Authorizes the Board to impose penalties established above.

House Republican Conference Summary

The summary below was written by the House Republican Conference, which is the caucus of Republicans in the House of Representatives.


No summary available.

House Democratic Caucus Summary

The House Democratic Caucus does not provide summaries of bills.

So, yes, we display the House Republican Conference’s summaries when available even if we do not have a Democratic summary available. That’s because we feel it is better to give you as much information as possible, even if we cannot provide every viewpoint.

We’ll be looking for a source of summaries from the other side in the meanwhile.

Use the comment space below for discussion of the merits of H.R. 3396 (105th) with other GovTrack users.
Your comments are not read by Congressional staff.

comments powered by Disqus