H.R. 4210 (105th): New Mexico Forest Health and Fire Prevention Act of 1998

Introduced:
Jul 14, 1998 (105th Congress, 1997–1998)
Status:
Died (Referred to Committee)
Sponsor
William Redmond
Representative for New Mexico's 3rd congressional district
Party
Republican
Text
Read Text »
Last Updated
Jul 14, 1998
Length
14 pages
 
Status

This bill was introduced on July 14, 1998, in a previous session of Congress, but was not enacted.

Progress
Introduced Jul 14, 1998
Referred to Committee Jul 14, 1998
 
Full Title

To address the simultaneous decline of forest health of National Forest System lands in the state of New Mexico and rural community economies and to prevent and protect such lands from catastrophic fires, consistent with the requirements of existing public land management and environmental laws.

Summary

No summaries available.

Cosponsors
none
Committees

House Agriculture

House Natural Resources

The committee chair determines whether a bill will move past the committee stage.

 
Primary Source

THOMAS.gov (The Library of Congress)

GovTrack gets most information from THOMAS, which is updated generally one day after events occur. Activity since the last update may not be reflected here. Data comes via the congress project.

Widget

Get a bill status widget for your website »

Citation

Click a format for a citation suggestion:

Notes

H.R. stands for House of Representatives bill.

A bill must be passed by both the House and Senate in identical form and then be signed by the president to become law.

The bill’s title was written by its sponsor.

GovTrack’s Bill Summary

We don’t have a summary available yet.

Library of Congress Summary

The summary below was written by the Congressional Research Service, which is a nonpartisan division of the Library of Congress.


7/14/1998--Introduced.
New Mexico Forest Health and Fire Prevention of 1998 - Directs the District 3 Regional Forester of the State of New Mexico to commence a statewide program to restore and protect forest resources located on Federal forest lands within New Mexico through the performance of recovery projects in identified recovery areas.
Requires:
(1) the initial project under such program to be the thinning of Monument Canyon Research Natural Area located near Jemez Springs, New Mexico, on the Santa Fe National Forest; and
(2) the research scientists located at such Area to provide the initial project standards and guidelines.
Directs the Secretary of Agriculture, for each fiscal year of the New Mexico program, to allocate amounts from the Forest Health and Fire Prevention Fund (to be established under this Act) to Region 3 of the Forest Service for the purpose of conducting five-year recovery projects in identified recovery areas.
Requires the District 3 Regional Forester to:
(1) identify recovery areas within which allocated amounts should be used to conduct such projects;
(2) prioritize such areas for the purpose of their receiving allocated amounts; and
(3) select, in accordance with specified requirements, projects to be carried out within each area.
Prohibits the selection or implementation of a project in specified locations, including units of the National Wilderness Preservation System. Credits to the Fund:
(1) authorized and appropriated amounts;
(2) unobligated amounts in, or that would otherwise be deposited in, the roads and trails fund; and
(3) the Federal share of revenues generated by recovery projects undertaken pursuant to the Program. Authorizes appropriations.
Directs the Comptroller General to conduct a specified audit of the program at the end of the fourth full fiscal year following the implementation date.

House Republican Conference Summary

The summary below was written by the House Republican Conference, which is the caucus of Republicans in the House of Representatives.


No summary available.

House Democratic Caucus Summary

The House Democratic Caucus does not provide summaries of bills.

So, yes, we display the House Republican Conference’s summaries when available even if we do not have a Democratic summary available. That’s because we feel it is better to give you as much information as possible, even if we cannot provide every viewpoint.

We’ll be looking for a source of summaries from the other side in the meanwhile.

Use the comment space below for discussion of the merits of H.R. 4210 (105th) with other GovTrack users.
Your comments are not read by Congressional staff.

comments powered by Disqus