H.R. 906 (108th): Surface Transportation Safety Act of 2003

Introduced:
Feb 25, 2003 (108th Congress, 2003–2004)
Status:
Died (Referred to Committee)
Sponsor
Jack Quinn
Representative for New York's 27th congressional district
Party
Republican
Text
Read Text »
Last Updated
Feb 25, 2003
Length
6 pages
 
Status

This bill was introduced on February 25, 2003, in a previous session of Congress, but was not enacted.

Progress
Introduced Feb 25, 2003
Referred to Committee Feb 25, 2003
 
Full Title

To amend title 23, United States Code, to improve roadway safety for motor vehicles, bicycles, and pedestrians and workers in proximity to vehicle traffic.

Summary

No summaries available.

Cosponsors
38 cosponsors (35R, 3D) (show)
Committees

House Transportation and Infrastructure

Highways and Transit

The committee chair determines whether a bill will move past the committee stage.

 
Primary Source

THOMAS.gov (The Library of Congress)

GovTrack gets most information from THOMAS, which is updated generally one day after events occur. Activity since the last update may not be reflected here. Data comes via the congress project.

Widget

Get a bill status widget for your website »

Citation

Click a format for a citation suggestion:

Notes

H.R. stands for House of Representatives bill.

A bill must be passed by both the House and Senate in identical form and then be signed by the president to become law.

The bill’s title was written by its sponsor.

GovTrack’s Bill Summary

We don’t have a summary available yet.

Library of Congress Summary

The summary below was written by the Congressional Research Service, which is a nonpartisan division of the Library of Congress.


2/25/2003--Introduced.
Surface Transportation Safety Act of 2003 - Amends Federal highway provisions to include within the definition of "safety improvement project" a project that installs or maintains fluorescent, yellow-green signs at pedestrian or bicycle crossings or school zones.Authorizes the payment from apportioned funds for the entire cost of construction projects involving the maintenance of protective devices at railway-highway crossings.Provides for biennial (currently, annual) reports by each State to the Secretary of Transportation on progress being made to implement the railway-highway crossings program.Requires each State to identify roadway safety improvement needs for hazardous locations, sections, and elements which may constitute a danger to motorists, bicyclists, and pedestrians.
Authorizes the Secretary to approve as a project under the hazard elimination program any safety improvement project that reduces the likelihood of crashes involving road departures, intersections, pedestrians, bicycles, older drivers, or construction work zones.
Makes funds available for:
(1) police assistance for traffic and speed management in construction work zones;
(2) installation of barriers between construction work zones and traffic lanes for the safety of motorists and workers; or
(3) compilation and analysis of data.Directs the Secretary to:
(1) transmit to specified congressional committees biennial reports on the results of the hazard elimination program; and
(2) issue regulations to decrease the likelihood of worker injury and maintain the free flow of vehicular traffic by requiring workers whose duties place them on or in close proximity to a Federal-aid highway to wear high visibility garments.
Authorizes such regulations to require other worker-safety measures.

House Republican Conference Summary

The summary below was written by the House Republican Conference, which is the caucus of Republicans in the House of Representatives.


No summary available.

House Democratic Caucus Summary

The House Democratic Caucus does not provide summaries of bills.

So, yes, we display the House Republican Conference’s summaries when available even if we do not have a Democratic summary available. That’s because we feel it is better to give you as much information as possible, even if we cannot provide every viewpoint.

We’ll be looking for a source of summaries from the other side in the meanwhile.

Use the comment space below for discussion of the merits of H.R. 906 (108th) with other GovTrack users.
Your comments are not read by Congressional staff.

comments powered by Disqus