S. 659 (108th): Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act

Introduced:
Mar 19, 2003 (108th Congress, 2003–2004)
Status:
Died (Referred to Committee)
See Instead:

H.R. 1036 (same title)
Passed House — Apr 09, 2003

Sponsor
Larry Craig
Senator from Idaho
Party
Republican
Text
Read Text »
Last Updated
Mar 19, 2003
Length
9 pages
Related Bills
S. 397 (109th) was a re-introduction of this bill in a later Congress.

Signed by the President
Oct 26, 2005

H.R. 1036 (Related)
Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act

Passed House
Last Action: Apr 09, 2003

 
Status

This bill was introduced on March 19, 2003, in a previous session of Congress, but was not enacted.

Progress
Introduced Mar 19, 2003
Referred to Committee Mar 19, 2003
 
Full Title

A bill to prohibit civil liability actions from being brought or continued against manufacturers, distributors, dealers, or importers of firearms or ammunition for damages resulting from the misuse of their products by others.

Summary

No summaries available.

 
Primary Source

THOMAS.gov (The Library of Congress)

GovTrack gets most information from THOMAS, which is updated generally one day after events occur. Activity since the last update may not be reflected here. Data comes via the congress project.

Widget

Get a bill status widget for your website »

Citation

Click a format for a citation suggestion:

Notes

S. stands for Senate bill.

A bill must be passed by both the House and Senate in identical form and then be signed by the president to become law.

The bill’s title was written by its sponsor.

GovTrack’s Bill Summary

We don’t have a summary available yet.

Library of Congress Summary

The summary below was written by the Congressional Research Service, which is a nonpartisan division of the Library of Congress.


3/19/2003--Introduced.
Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act - Prohibits any qualified civil liability action from being brought in any State or Federal court and requires pending actions to be dismissed.
Defines such an action to:
(1) include an action brought against a manufacturer or seller of a firearm, ammunition, or a component of a firearm that has been shipped or transported in interstate or foreign commerce, or against a trade association of such manufacturers or sellers, for damages resulting from the criminal or unlawful misuse of a firearm; and
(2) exclude an action brought against persons who transfer a firearm knowing that it will be used to commit a crime of violence or a drug trafficking crime; an action brought against a seller for negligent entrustment or negligence per se; an action in which a manufacturer or seller of a firearm willfully violated a State or Federal statute applicable to the sale or marketing of the firearm and the violation was a proximate cause of the harm for which relief is sought; an action for breach of contract or warranty in connection with the purchase of the firearm; or an action for physical injuries or property damage resulting directly from a defect in design or manufacture of the firearm when used as intended.

House Republican Conference Summary

The summary below was written by the House Republican Conference, which is the caucus of Republicans in the House of Representatives.


No summary available.

House Democratic Caucus Summary

The House Democratic Caucus does not provide summaries of bills.

So, yes, we display the House Republican Conference’s summaries when available even if we do not have a Democratic summary available. That’s because we feel it is better to give you as much information as possible, even if we cannot provide every viewpoint.

We’ll be looking for a source of summaries from the other side in the meanwhile.

Use the comment space below for discussion of the merits of S. 659 (108th) with other GovTrack users.
Your comments are not read by Congressional staff.

comments powered by Disqus