S. 178 (109th): New Mexico Water Planning Assistance Act

Jan 26, 2005 (109th Congress, 2005–2006)
Died (Passed Senate) in a previous session of Congress
See Instead:

H.R. 1711 (same title)
Passed House — Sep 27, 2006

This bill was introduced in a previous session of Congress and was passed by the Senate on July 26, 2005 but was never passed by the House.

Jan 26, 2005
Reported by Committee
Feb 09, 2005
Passed Senate
Jul 26, 2005
Pete Domenici
Senator from New Mexico
Read Text »
Last Updated
Jul 27, 2005
5 pages
Related Bills
S. 2460 (108th) was a previous version of this bill.

Passed Senate
Last Action: Sep 15, 2004

S. 255 (110th) was a re-introduction of this bill in a later Congress.

Reported by Committee
Last Action: Jan 31, 2007

Full Title

A bill to provide assistance to the State of New Mexico for the development of comprehensive State water plans, and for other purposes.


No summaries available.

1 cosponsors (1D) (show)

House Natural Resources

Water and Power

Senate Energy and Natural Resources

The committee chair determines whether a bill will move past the committee stage.

Primary Source

THOMAS.gov (The Library of Congress)

GovTrack gets most information from THOMAS, which is updated generally one day after events occur. Activity since the last update may not be reflected here. Data comes via the congress project.


Get a bill status widget for your website »


Click a format for a citation suggestion:


S. stands for Senate bill.

A bill must be passed by both the House and Senate in identical form and then be signed by the president to become law.

The bill’s title was written by its sponsor.

GovTrack’s Bill Summary

We don’t have a summary available yet.

Library of Congress Summary

The summary below was written by the Congressional Research Service, which is a nonpartisan division of the Library of Congress.

7/26/2005--Passed Senate without amendment.
New Mexico Water Planning Assistance Act - Directs the Secretary of the Interior, at the request of the Governor of New Mexico and acting through the Bureau of Reclamation and the U.S. Geological Survey, to:
(1) provide to New Mexico technical assistance and grants for the development of comprehensive state water plans;
(2) conduct water resources mapping in New Mexico; and
(3) conduct a comprehensive study of groundwater resources in New Mexico to assess the quantity, quality, and interaction of groundwater and surface water resources.
Lists types of technical assistance that may be provided, including acquisition of hydrologic data, expansion of groundwater monitoring networks, and coordination of federal water management planning efforts.
Directs the Secretary to allocate specified funds:
(1) to develop hydrologic models and acquire associated equipment for the New Mexico Rio Grande main stem sections and Rios Pueblo de Taos and Hondo, Rios Nambe, Pojoaque and Teseque, Rio Chama, and Lower Rio Grande tributaries;
(2) to complete the hydrographic survey development of hydrologic models and acquire associated equipment for the San Juan River and tributaries and for Southwest New Mexico, including the Animas Basin, the Gila River, and tributaries; and
(3) for statewide digital orthophotography mapping.
Sets the non-federal share of the total cost of any activity carried out using a grant under this Act at 50 percent, which may be in the form of in-kind services as determined by the Secretary.

House Republican Conference Summary

The summary below was written by the House Republican Conference, which is the caucus of Republicans in the House of Representatives.

No summary available.

House Democratic Caucus Summary

The House Democratic Caucus does not provide summaries of bills.

So, yes, we display the House Republican Conference’s summaries when available even if we do not have a Democratic summary available. That’s because we feel it is better to give you as much information as possible, even if we cannot provide every viewpoint.

We’ll be looking for a source of summaries from the other side in the meanwhile.

Use the comment space below for discussion of the merits of S. 178 (109th) with other GovTrack users.
Your comments are not read by Congressional staff.

comments powered by Disqus