S. 340 (109th): Free Flow of Information Act of 2005

Introduced:
Feb 09, 2005 (109th Congress, 2005–2006)
Status:
Died (Referred to Committee)
See Instead:

S. 1419 (same title)
Referred to Committee — Jul 18, 2005

H.R. 3323 (same title)
Referred to Committee — Jul 18, 2005

Sponsor
Richard Lugar
Senator from Indiana
Party
Republican
Text
Read Text »
Last Updated
Feb 09, 2005
Length
7 pages
Related Bills
S. 1267 (110th) was a re-introduction of this bill in a later Congress.

Referred to Committee
Last Action: May 02, 2007

H.R. 581 (identical)

Referred to Committee
Last Action: Feb 02, 2005

 
Status

This bill was introduced on February 9, 2005, in a previous session of Congress, but was not enacted.

Progress
Introduced Feb 09, 2005
Referred to Committee Feb 09, 2005
 
Full Title

A bill to maintain the free flow of information to the public by providing conditions for the federally compelled disclosure of information by certain persons connected with the news media.

Summary

No summaries available.

Cosponsors
10 cosponsors (6D, 3R, 1I) (show)
Committees

Senate Judiciary

The committee chair determines whether a bill will move past the committee stage.

 
Primary Source

THOMAS.gov (The Library of Congress)

GovTrack gets most information from THOMAS, which is updated generally one day after events occur. Activity since the last update may not be reflected here. Data comes via the congress project.

Widget

Get a bill status widget for your website »

Citation

Click a format for a citation suggestion:

Notes

S. stands for Senate bill.

A bill must be passed by both the House and Senate in identical form and then be signed by the president to become law.

The bill’s title was written by its sponsor.

GovTrack’s Bill Summary

We don’t have a summary available yet.

Library of Congress Summary

The summary below was written by the Congressional Research Service, which is a nonpartisan division of the Library of Congress.


2/9/2005--Introduced.
Free Flow of Information Act of 2005 - Prohibits Federal entities from compelling covered persons (specified media outlets or their employees) to testify or produce any document unless a court determines by clear and convincing evidence that:
(1) the entity has unsuccessfully attempted to obtain such testimony or document from all non-covered persons; and
(2) in a criminal matter, based on information from a non-covered person, there are reasonable grounds to believe a crime has occurred and the testimony or document is essential to the investigation, prosecution, or defense; or
(3) in a non-criminal matter, based on information from a non-covered person, the testimony or document is essential to a dispositive issue of substantial importance.
Requires the content of compelled testimony or documents to be: (1) limited to the purpose of verifying published information; and (2) narrowly tailored in subject matter and time period covered.
Excludes certain commercial or financial information from coverage under this Act.
Prohibits compelled disclosure, notwithstanding this Act's conditions for such disclosure, of: (1) the identity of a confidential source; or (2) information reasonably expected to lead to the discovery of such identity.
Makes this Act applicable to testimony or documents sought from third parties that are related to business transactions with covered persons. Authorizes compelled disclosure in such cases only where the covered person has received notice and an opportunity to be heard.
States that publication or dissemination of testimony or documents does not waive the requirements for compelled disclosure set forth in this Act.

House Republican Conference Summary

The summary below was written by the House Republican Conference, which is the caucus of Republicans in the House of Representatives.


No summary available.

House Democratic Caucus Summary

The House Democratic Caucus does not provide summaries of bills.

So, yes, we display the House Republican Conference’s summaries when available even if we do not have a Democratic summary available. That’s because we feel it is better to give you as much information as possible, even if we cannot provide every viewpoint.

We’ll be looking for a source of summaries from the other side in the meanwhile.

Use the comment space below for discussion of the merits of S. 340 (109th) with other GovTrack users.
Your comments are not read by Congressional staff.

comments powered by Disqus