S. 3772 (109th): White Pine County Conservation, Recreation, and Development Act of 2006

Introduced:
Aug 01, 2006 (109th Congress, 2005–2006)
Status:
Died (Referred to Committee)
Sponsor
John Ensign
Senator from Nevada
Party
Republican
Text
Read Text »
Last Updated
Aug 01, 2006
Length
71 pages
Related Bills
H.R. 6111 (Related)
Tax Relief and Health Care Act of 2006

Signed by the President
Dec 20, 2006

 
Status

This bill was introduced on August 1, 2006, in a previous session of Congress, but was not enacted.

Progress
Introduced Aug 01, 2006
Referred to Committee Aug 01, 2006
 
Full Title

A bill to establish wilderness areas, promote conservation, improve public land, and provide for high quality development in White Pine County, Nevada, and for other purposes.

Summary

No summaries available.

Cosponsors
1 cosponsors (1D) (show)
Committees

Senate Energy and Natural Resources

Public Lands, Forests, and Mining

The committee chair determines whether a bill will move past the committee stage.

 
Primary Source

THOMAS.gov (The Library of Congress)

GovTrack gets most information from THOMAS, which is updated generally one day after events occur. Activity since the last update may not be reflected here. Data comes via the congress project.

Widget

Get a bill status widget for your website »

Citation

Click a format for a citation suggestion:

Notes

S. stands for Senate bill.

A bill must be passed by both the House and Senate in identical form and then be signed by the president to become law.

The bill’s title was written by its sponsor.

GovTrack’s Bill Summary

We don’t have a summary available yet.

Library of Congress Summary

The summary below was written by the Congressional Research Service, which is a nonpartisan division of the Library of Congress.


8/1/2006--Introduced.
White Pine County Conservation, Recreation, and Development Act of 2006 - Directs the Secretary of the Interior (Secretary) to conduct sales of certain Bureau of Land Management (BLM) land in White Pine County, Nevada.
Pam White Wilderness Act of 2006 - Designates certain federal land in Nevada as wilderness components of the National Wilderness Preservation System.
Transfers administrative jurisdiction over: (1) certain land from BLM to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for inclusion in Ruby Lake National Wildlife Refuge; and (2) specified National Forest Service (Department of Agriculture) land to BLM (Department of the Interior).
Directs the Secretary to convey: (1) specified land to the state of Nevada if the state and the county concerned enter into an agreement supporting such conveyance; and (2) certain land to White Pine County, Nevada, to be used for the expansion of White Pine County airport and White Pine County Industrial Park.
Directs the Secretary to study and designate the preferred route for the Silver State Off-Highway Vehicle Trail.
Transfers certain land to the Ely Shoshone Indian Tribe.
Directs such Secretaries of Agriculture and of the Interior to carry out the Eastern Nevada Landscape Restoration Project to: (1) implement the Great Basin Restoration Initiative; and (2) restore native rangelands and woodland in White Pine and Lincoln Counties in Nevada.
Makes conforming amendments to the Southern Nevada Public Land Management Act of 1998.
Great Basin National Heritage Route Act - Establishes the Great Basin National Heritage Route to provide public access to certain resources in White Pine County, Nevada, Millard County, Utah, and the Duckwater Shoshone Reservation in Nevada.

House Republican Conference Summary

The summary below was written by the House Republican Conference, which is the caucus of Republicans in the House of Representatives.


No summary available.

House Democratic Caucus Summary

The House Democratic Caucus does not provide summaries of bills.

So, yes, we display the House Republican Conference’s summaries when available even if we do not have a Democratic summary available. That’s because we feel it is better to give you as much information as possible, even if we cannot provide every viewpoint.

We’ll be looking for a source of summaries from the other side in the meanwhile.

Use the comment space below for discussion of the merits of S. 3772 (109th) with other GovTrack users.
Your comments are not read by Congressional staff.

comments powered by Disqus