S.Res. 442 (109th): A resolution expressing the deep disappointment of the Senate with respect to the election of Iran to a leadership position in the United Nations Disarmament Commission and requesting the President to withhold funding to the United Nations unless credible reforms are made.

Introduced:
Apr 25, 2006 (109th Congress, 2005–2006)
Status:
Died (Referred to Committee)
Sponsor
Norm Coleman
Senator from Minnesota
Party
Republican
Text
Read Text »
Last Updated
Apr 25, 2006
Length
5 pages
Related Bills
H.Res. 786 (Related)
Condemning the recent election of the Iranian Ambassador to the United Nations to the ...

Referred to Committee
Last Action: Apr 27, 2006

 
Status

This resolution was introduced on April 25, 2006, in a previous session of Congress, but was not enacted.

Progress
Introduced Apr 25, 2006
Referred to Committee Apr 25, 2006
 
Summary

No summaries available.

Cosponsors
5 cosponsors (5R) (show)
Committees

Senate Foreign Relations

The committee chair determines whether a resolution will move past the committee stage.

 
Primary Source

THOMAS.gov (The Library of Congress)

GovTrack gets most information from THOMAS, which is updated generally one day after events occur. Activity since the last update may not be reflected here. Data comes via the congress project.

Widget

Get a bill status widget for your website »

Citation

Click a format for a citation suggestion:

Notes

S.Res. stands for Senate simple resolution.

A simple resolution is used for matters that affect just one chamber of Congress, often to change the rules of the chamber to set the manner of debate for a related bill. It must be agreed to in the chamber in which it was introduced. It is not voted on in the other chamber and does not have the force of law.

The resolution’s title was written by its sponsor.

GovTrack’s Bill Summary

We don’t have a summary available yet.

Library of Congress Summary

The summary below was written by the Congressional Research Service, which is a nonpartisan division of the Library of Congress.


4/25/2006--Introduced.
Expresses disappointment at the failure of the Asia group members of the United Nations Disarmament Commission to stop Iran's election as vice chair of that body.
Asserts that the Commission has no credibility on disarmament issues due to Iran's participation, particularly in light of Iran's defiance in disregarding International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and the Security Council Presidential Statement resolutions relating to its nuclear program.
Calls on the United States to reject all Commission resolutions.
Condemns Iran's continued intransigence with respect to its nuclear program, treatment of Israel, and sponsorship of terror.
States that the Senate shall work to ensure that U.S. funding is withheld from: (1) the regular budget of the United Nations in the amount directed towards the Commission; and (2) any U.N. commission in which the worst violators of the principles it claims to promote are included in its membership.
Calls on the United Nations to deny Iranian participation in any U.N. commission until it: (1) complies with Non-Proliferation Treaty and IAEA resolutions; (2) halts all uranium enrichment activities and its calls for Israel's destruction; and (3) withdraws terrorist support.
Calls on the President to monitor U.N. reform and withhold funding unless credible reforms are made prior to biannual budget discussions.

House Republican Conference Summary

The summary below was written by the House Republican Conference, which is the caucus of Republicans in the House of Representatives.


No summary available.

House Democratic Caucus Summary

The House Democratic Caucus does not provide summaries of bills.

So, yes, we display the House Republican Conference’s summaries when available even if we do not have a Democratic summary available. That’s because we feel it is better to give you as much information as possible, even if we cannot provide every viewpoint.

We’ll be looking for a source of summaries from the other side in the meanwhile.

Use the comment space below for discussion of the merits of S.Res. 442 (109th) with other GovTrack users.
Your comments are not read by Congressional staff.

comments powered by Disqus