H.R. 34 (110th): To establish a pilot program in certain United States district courts to encourage enhancement of expertise in patent cases among district judges.

Introduced:
Jan 04, 2007 (110th Congress, 2007–2009)
Status:
Died (Passed House)
Sponsor
Darrell Issa
Representative for California's 49th congressional district
Party
Republican
Text
Read Text »
Last Updated
Feb 13, 2007
Length
7 pages
Related Bills
H.R. 5418 (109th) was a previous version of this bill.

Passed House
Last Action: Sep 28, 2006

H.R. 628 (111th) was a re-introduction of this bill in a later Congress.

Signed by the President
Jan 04, 2011

 
Status

This bill was introduced in a previous session of Congress and was passed by the House on February 12, 2007 but was never passed by the Senate.

Progress
Introduced Jan 04, 2007
Referred to Committee Jan 04, 2007
Passed House Feb 12, 2007
 
Summary

No summaries available.

Cosponsors
2 cosponsors (2D) (show)
Committees

House Judiciary

Courts, Intellectual Property, and the Internet

Senate Judiciary

The committee chair determines whether a bill will move past the committee stage.

 
Primary Source

THOMAS.gov (The Library of Congress)

GovTrack gets most information from THOMAS, which is updated generally one day after events occur. Activity since the last update may not be reflected here. Data comes via the congress project.

Widget

Get a bill status widget for your website »

Citation

Click a format for a citation suggestion:

Notes

H.R. stands for House of Representatives bill.

A bill must be passed by both the House and Senate in identical form and then be signed by the president to become law.

The bill’s title was written by its sponsor.

GovTrack’s Bill Summary

We don’t have a summary available yet.

Library of Congress Summary

The summary below was written by the Congressional Research Service, which is a nonpartisan division of the Library of Congress.


2/12/2007--Passed House without amendment.
Establishes a pilot program in certain U.S. district courts under which:
(1) those district judges who request to hear cases involving patent or plant variety protection issues are designated by the chief judge to hear them;
(2) such cases are randomly assigned to the district court judges, regardless of whether they are designated;
(3) a judge not designated to whom such a case is assigned may decline to accept the case; and
(4) a case so declined is randomly reassigned to one of those judges so designated.

House Republican Conference Summary

The summary below was written by the House Republican Conference, which is the caucus of Republicans in the House of Representatives.


No summary available.

House Democratic Caucus Summary

The House Democratic Caucus does not provide summaries of bills.

So, yes, we display the House Republican Conference’s summaries when available even if we do not have a Democratic summary available. That’s because we feel it is better to give you as much information as possible, even if we cannot provide every viewpoint.

We’ll be looking for a source of summaries from the other side in the meanwhile.

Use the comment space below for discussion of the merits of H.R. 34 (110th) with other GovTrack users.
Your comments are not read by Congressional staff.

comments powered by Disqus