H.R. 5607 (110th): State Secret Protection Act of 2008

Introduced:
Mar 13, 2008 (110th Congress, 2007–2009)
Status:
Died (Referred to Committee) in a previous session of Congress

This bill was introduced on March 13, 2008, in a previous session of Congress, but was not enacted.

Introduced
Mar 13, 2008
 
Sponsor
Jerrold Nadler
Representative for New York's 8th congressional district
Party
Democrat
Text
Read Text »
Last Updated
Mar 13, 2008
Length
13 pages
Related Bills
H.R. 984 (111th) was a re-introduction of this bill in a later Congress.

Reported by Committee
Last Action: Nov 05, 2009

 
Full Title

To provide safe, fair, and responsible procedures and standards for resolving claims of state secret privilege.

Summary

No summaries available.

 
Cosponsors
8 cosponsors (7D, 1R) (show)
Committees

House Judiciary

The Constitution and Civil Justice

The committee chair determines whether a bill will move past the committee stage.

 
Primary Source

THOMAS.gov (The Library of Congress)

GovTrack gets most information from THOMAS, which is updated generally one day after events occur. Activity since the last update may not be reflected here. Data comes via the congress project.

Widget

Get a bill status widget for your website »

Citation

Click a format for a citation suggestion:

Notes

H.R. stands for House of Representatives bill.

A bill must be passed by both the House and Senate in identical form and then be signed by the president to become law.

The bill’s title was written by its sponsor.

GovTrack’s Bill Summary

We don’t have a summary available yet.

Library of Congress Summary

The summary below was written by the Congressional Research Service, which is a nonpartisan division of the Library of Congress.


3/13/2008--Introduced.
State Secret Protection Act of 2008 - Declares that in any civil action brought in federal or state court the government has a privilege to refuse to give evidence and to prevent any person from giving evidence only if the government shows that public disclosure of the evidence that the government seeks to protect would be reasonably likely to cause significant harm to the national defense or the diplomatic relations of the United States.
Requires the court to take steps, including in camera hearings and other proceedings, to protect sensitive information that comes before it.
Sets forth rules regarding the participation of counsel or the disclosure of information when it presents a risk of harm. Provides for court-ordered presentation of adequate or nonprivileged substitutes for privileged evidence.
Allows the government to: (1) assert the privilege in connection with any claim in a civil action to which it is a party; or (2) intervene in a civil action to which it is not a party in order to do so.
Provides that once the government has asserted the privilege, and before the court makes any determinations, the court shall: (1) undertake a preliminary review of the information in question; and (2) provide the government an opportunity to seek protective measures under this Act.
Establishes procedures and a standard for assessing the privilege claim.
Allows disclosure of an item of evidence to a nongovernmental party, or admission at trial, if the court determines that the privilege is not validly asserted. Prohibits such disclosure or admission if the privilege is determined valid.
Grants the courts of appeal jurisdiction of an appeal by any party from any interlocutory decision or order of a U.S. district court.

House Republican Conference Summary

The summary below was written by the House Republican Conference, which is the caucus of Republicans in the House of Representatives.


No summary available.

House Democratic Caucus Summary

The House Democratic Caucus does not provide summaries of bills.

So, yes, we display the House Republican Conference’s summaries when available even if we do not have a Democratic summary available. That’s because we feel it is better to give you as much information as possible, even if we cannot provide every viewpoint.

We’ll be looking for a source of summaries from the other side in the meanwhile.

Use the comment space below for discussion of the merits of H.R. 5607 (110th) with other GovTrack users.
Your comments are not read by Congressional staff.

comments powered by Disqus