H.R. 6364 (110th): Puget Sound Recovery Act of 2008

Introduced:
Jun 25, 2008 (110th Congress, 2007–2009)
Status:
Died (Referred to Committee)
Sponsor
Norman “Norm” Dicks
Representative for Washington's 6th congressional district
Party
Democrat
Text
Read Text »
Last Updated
Jun 25, 2008
Length
12 pages
Related Bills
H.R. 4029 (111th) was a re-introduction of this bill in a later Congress.

Referred to Committee
Last Action: Nov 05, 2009

S. 3196 (identical)

Referred to Committee
Last Action: Jun 25, 2008

 
Status

This bill was introduced on June 25, 2008, in a previous session of Congress, but was not enacted.

Progress
Introduced Jun 25, 2008
Referred to Committee Jun 25, 2008
 
Full Title

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to provide assistance for programs and activities to protect the water quality of Puget Sound, and for other purposes.

Summary

No summaries available.

Cosponsors
6 cosponsors (5D, 1R) (show)
Committees

House Transportation and Infrastructure

Water Resources and Environment

The committee chair determines whether a bill will move past the committee stage.

 
Primary Source

THOMAS.gov (The Library of Congress)

GovTrack gets most information from THOMAS, which is updated generally one day after events occur. Activity since the last update may not be reflected here. Data comes via the congress project.

Widget

Get a bill status widget for your website »

Citation

Click a format for a citation suggestion:

Notes

H.R. stands for House of Representatives bill.

A bill must be passed by both the House and Senate in identical form and then be signed by the president to become law.

The bill’s title was written by its sponsor.

GovTrack’s Bill Summary

We don’t have a summary available yet.

Library of Congress Summary

The summary below was written by the Congressional Research Service, which is a nonpartisan division of the Library of Congress.


6/25/2008--Introduced.
Puget Sound Recovery Act of 2008 - Amends the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (commonly known as the Clean Water Act) to direct the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to establish a Puget Sound Program Office, to be located in the state of Washington and headed by a Director who shall assist the management conference convened for Puget Sound in carrying out its goals.
Requires the Director to:
(1) assist and support the implementation of the comprehensive conservation and management plan developed by the conference ("Comprehensive Plan");
(2) coordinate the major functions of the federal government related to the implementation of the Comprehensive Plan;
(3) carry out studies and research necessary for strengthened implementation of the Comprehensive Plan;
(4) coordinate and manage environmental data related to Puget Sound;
(5) coordinate the grant, research, and planning programs authorized under this Act;
(6) coordinate activities for the protection of Puget Sound and the Georgia Straits with Canadian authorities and responsibilities, including under species recovery plans, through cooperation with other federal agencies that have jurisdiction in the Puget Sound watershed; and
(7) collect and make available to the public information relating to the environmental quality of Puget Sound.
Requires a biennial report to Congress on the implementation of the Comprehensive Plan.
Allows the Administrator to make grants for projects and studies that will help implement the Comprehensive Plan and for projects to address sewage and stormwater discharges into the Puget Sound watershed.
Requires the President, as part of the annual budget, to submit information regarding expenditures and roles of each federal agency involved in Puget Sound protection and restoration.

House Republican Conference Summary

The summary below was written by the House Republican Conference, which is the caucus of Republicans in the House of Representatives.


No summary available.

House Democratic Caucus Summary

The House Democratic Caucus does not provide summaries of bills.

So, yes, we display the House Republican Conference’s summaries when available even if we do not have a Democratic summary available. That’s because we feel it is better to give you as much information as possible, even if we cannot provide every viewpoint.

We’ll be looking for a source of summaries from the other side in the meanwhile.

Use the comment space below for discussion of the merits of H.R. 6364 (110th) with other GovTrack users.
Your comments are not read by Congressional staff.

comments powered by Disqus