H.R. 648 (110th): No Child Left Behind Improvements Act of 2007

Jan 23, 2007 (110th Congress, 2007–2009)
Died (Referred to Committee)
Don Young
Representative for Alaska At Large
Read Text »
Last Updated
Jan 23, 2007
31 pages
Related Bills
H.R. 5709 (109th) was a previous version of this bill.

Referred to Committee
Last Action: Jun 28, 2006


This bill was introduced on January 23, 2007, in a previous session of Congress, but was not enacted.

Introduced Jan 23, 2007
Referred to Committee Jan 23, 2007
Full Title

To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, and for other purposes.


No summaries available.

28 cosponsors (16D, 12R) (show)

House Education and the Workforce

Early Childhood, Elementary, and Secondary Education

The committee chair determines whether a bill will move past the committee stage.

Primary Source

THOMAS.gov (The Library of Congress)

GovTrack gets most information from THOMAS, which is updated generally one day after events occur. Activity since the last update may not be reflected here. Data comes via the congress project.


Get a bill status widget for your website »


Click a format for a citation suggestion:


H.R. stands for House of Representatives bill.

A bill must be passed by both the House and Senate in identical form and then be signed by the president to become law.

The bill’s title was written by its sponsor.

GovTrack’s Bill Summary

We don’t have a summary available yet.

Library of Congress Summary

The summary below was written by the Congressional Research Service, which is a nonpartisan division of the Library of Congress.

No Child Left Behind Improvements Act of 2007 - Amends the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (ESEA) to alter requirements for adequate yearly progress (AYP) assessments of student groups by:
(1) allowing states to vary the number of students sufficient for such an assessment from local educational agency (LEA) to LEA and from school to school;
(2) lowering the percentage of students in a failing group who must show improvement from the preceding year for a school to avoid corrective action;
(3) changing the method of counting students in more than one group;
(4) allowing states to use alternative methods of defining AYP;
(5) exempting a higher percentage of students from such assessments;
(6) giving states greater flexibility in the use of alternative assessments for disabled students and those not proficient in English; and
(7) allowing multiple assessments of the same student prior to the following school year and measurement of the achievement of students as if they were in their prior grade.
Provides that a state's intermediate academic achievement goals need not increase in equal increments for all groups.
Requires that states be given maximum flexibility in devising academic improvement plans.
Limits the implementation of sanctions to schools and LEAs that fail AYP standards in the same subject for the same group for two consecutive school years, and the provision of school transfers and supplemental services to students in the group who failed AYP standards. Provides further exceptions to and conditions on the application of corrective actions.
Involves LEAs in the choice and critique of supplemental service providers as well as the provision of such services.
Authorizes states, LEAs, and schools to defer implementation of certain corrective actions in any fiscal year when the amount appropriated under ESEA and the Individuals with Disabilities Act does not equal or exceed a specified authorized amount.
Applies AYP assessments to private schools receiving benefits under ESEA. Allows states to deny such benefits to private schools that fail state AYP standards for three consecutive years and underperform local public schools.

House Republican Conference Summary

The summary below was written by the House Republican Conference, which is the caucus of Republicans in the House of Representatives.

No summary available.

House Democratic Caucus Summary

The House Democratic Caucus does not provide summaries of bills.

So, yes, we display the House Republican Conference’s summaries when available even if we do not have a Democratic summary available. That’s because we feel it is better to give you as much information as possible, even if we cannot provide every viewpoint.

We’ll be looking for a source of summaries from the other side in the meanwhile.

Use the comment space below for discussion of the merits of H.R. 648 (110th) with other GovTrack users.
Your comments are not read by Congressional staff.

comments powered by Disqus