H.R. 903 (110th): Colorado Northern Front Range Mountain Backdrop Protection Study Act

Introduced:
Feb 07, 2007 (110th Congress, 2007–2009)
Status:
Died (Passed House)
See Instead:

S. 2508 (same title)
Referred to Committee — Dec 18, 2007

Sponsor
Mark Udall
Representative for Colorado's 2nd congressional district
Party
Democrat
Text
Read Text »
Last Updated
Sep 16, 2008
Length
10 pages
Related Bills
H.R. 2110 (109th) was a previous version of this bill.

Passed House
Last Action: Sep 27, 2006

S. 188 (111th) was a re-introduction of this bill in a later Congress.

Referred to Committee
Last Action: Jan 08, 2009

 
Status

This bill was introduced in a previous session of Congress and was passed by the House on March 5, 2007 but was never passed by the Senate.

Progress
Introduced Feb 07, 2007
Referred to Committee Feb 07, 2007
Passed House Mar 05, 2007
 
Full Title

To provide for a study of options for protecting the open space characteristics of certain lands in and adjacent to the Arapaho and Roosevelt National Forests in Colorado, and for other purposes.

Summary

No summaries available.

Cosponsors
none
Committees

House Natural Resources

Public Lands and Environmental Regulation

Senate Energy and Natural Resources

Public Lands, Forests, and Mining

The committee chair determines whether a bill will move past the committee stage.

 
Primary Source

THOMAS.gov (The Library of Congress)

GovTrack gets most information from THOMAS, which is updated generally one day after events occur. Activity since the last update may not be reflected here. Data comes via the congress project.

Widget

Get a bill status widget for your website »

Citation

Click a format for a citation suggestion:

Notes

H.R. stands for House of Representatives bill.

A bill must be passed by both the House and Senate in identical form and then be signed by the president to become law.

The bill’s title was written by its sponsor.

GovTrack’s Bill Summary

We don’t have a summary available yet.

Library of Congress Summary

The summary below was written by the Congressional Research Service, which is a nonpartisan division of the Library of Congress.


9/16/2008--Reported to Senate amended.
Colorado Northern Front Range Mountain Backdrop Protection Study Act - Requires the Secretary of Agriculture, acting through the Chief of the Forest Service, to conduct a study of the land within the study area (certain lands in southern Boulder, northern Jefferson, and northern Gilpin Counties, Colorado) and complete a report:
(1) identifying the present ownership of the land within the study area;
(2) identifying any undeveloped land that may be at risk of development; and
(3) describing any actions that could be taken to preserve the open and undeveloped character of the land within the study area.
Requires the Secretary to conduct the study and develop the report with the support and participation of one or more specified state and local entities.
Allows the Secretary if such state and local entities do not support and participate in the study and report to: (1) decrease the area covered by the study area, as appropriate; or (2) opt not to conduct the study or develop the report and notify specified congressional committees of such decision.
Prohibits anything in this Act from authorizing the Secretary of Agriculture to take any action that would affect the use of any land not owned by the United States.

House Republican Conference Summary

The summary below was written by the House Republican Conference, which is the caucus of Republicans in the House of Representatives.


No summary available.

House Democratic Caucus Summary

The House Democratic Caucus does not provide summaries of bills.

So, yes, we display the House Republican Conference’s summaries when available even if we do not have a Democratic summary available. That’s because we feel it is better to give you as much information as possible, even if we cannot provide every viewpoint.

We’ll be looking for a source of summaries from the other side in the meanwhile.

Use the comment space below for discussion of the merits of H.R. 903 (110th) with other GovTrack users.
Your comments are not read by Congressional staff.

comments powered by Disqus