GovTrack’s Bill Summary
We don’t have a summary available yet.
This bill was introduced in a previous session of Congress and was passed by the House on October 15, 2009 but was never passed by the Senate.
Last updated Sep 27, 2010.
|Referred to Committee|
|Reported by Committee|
|Failed Under Suspension|
To amend the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater Study and Facilities Act to expand the Bay Area Regional Water Recycling Program, and for other purposes.
GovTrack gets most information from THOMAS, which is updated generally one day after events occur. Activity since the last update may not be reflected here.
The committee chair determines whether a bill will move past the committee stage.
No summaries available.
Click a format for a citation suggestion:
H.R. 2442--111th Congress: Bay Area Regional Water Recycling Program Expansion Act of 2009. (2009). In www.GovTrack.us. Retrieved March 9, 2014, from http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/111/hr2442
“H.R. 2442--111th Congress: Bay Area Regional Water Recycling Program Expansion Act of 2009.” www.GovTrack.us. 2009. March 9, 2014 <http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/111/hr2442>
|title=H.R. 2442 (111th)
|accessdate=March 9, 2014
|author=111th Congress (2009)
|date=May 14, 2009
|quote=Bay Area Regional Water Recycling Program Expansion Act of 2009
We don’t have a summary available yet.
The summary below was written by the Congressional Research Service, which is a nonpartisan division of the Library of Congress.
The summary below was written by the House Republican Conference, which is the caucus of Republicans in the House of Representatives.
This summary can be found at http://www.gop.gov/bill/111/1/hr2442.
The Bureau of Reclamation (BOR) was created in 1902 to construct dams and powerplants in the west. The Bureau is now the largest wholesaler of water in the nation and operates in 17 western States. According to the Bureau, California's water shortage has continually worsened over the past three years. BOR recently stated that, "The State is in its third year of a severe drought, caused by below average precipitation and significantly lower run-off into the Sacramento-San Joaquin Bay Delta. As a result, one-third less water is available to the 25 million Californians who depend on the Bay Delta for their drinking water and for the farms in the Central Valley that produce half of the nation's fruits and vegetables."
At this time of severe drought, while localities in the San Francisco Bay area are seeking federal money for local water needs, Democrats have continued to block legislation to allow desperately need water to flow to the San Joaquin Valley. The San Joaquin Valley is home to numerous farm communities that are suffering from high levels of unemployment because they have been blocked from accessing water in the name of protecting the habitat of the Delta smelt, a three inch fish. Because of a "biological opinion" issued by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, massive water reductions were ordered in the San Joaquin Valley, which has contributed to a devastating economic collapse in the areas farming communities. According to the Wall Street Journal, the jobless rate in the inland areas affected by the reductions is 14.3 percent compared to the State-wide rate of 11.6 percent. In the community of Mendota alone, the unemployment rate is nearing 40 percent and a recent study by the University of California-Davis found that 500,000 acres will be fallowed this year because of water restrictions.
In order to address this immediate problem and relieve the small farmers in California, Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA) introduced H.R. 3105, the Turn on the Pumps Act, which would overrule Fish and Wildlife's biological opinion and allow water to flow again at no cost to taxpayers. Despite bipartisan support for the bill, Democrat leadership has refused to consider the legislation. In the meantime, the Democrats scheduled H.R. 2442 to spend millions in federal money on local water projects in San Francisco Bay area, which does not depend on agricultural irrigation to support its prime industry. Some Members were concerned that the legislation provided federal funding for local water development in the Bay area, while the Democrats refuse to turn on the water pumps for distressed families, farmers, and businesses in the San Joaquin Valley. In light of these events, H.R. 2442 was defeated under a suspension of the rules requiring a two-thirds majority for passage on September 30, 2009, by a vote of 240-170.
H.R. 2442 would authorize funding for the Department of the Interior to participate in the planning, design, and construction of six local water use facilities in California as follows:
• $1.8 million for the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District.
• $1.1 million for the Dublin San Ramon Services District.
• $6 million for the City of Petaluma.
• $8 million for the City of Redwood City.
• $8.2 million for the City of Palo Alto.
• $7 million for the Ironhouse Sanitary District.
The bill would also expand the authorized spending level for two other water districts in California:
• Increases funding for Antioch Recycled Water Project from $2.2 million to $3.1 million.
• Increases funding for the South Bay Advanced Recycled Water Treatment Facility from $8.2 million to $13.2 million.
The bill prohibits the federal share of the cost from exceeding 25 percent of the total cost, and the Department would not be permitted to provide operations or maintenance costs for the facilities.
According to CBO, H.R. 2442 would cost $38 million over the FY 2010-2014 for local water projects in the San Francisco Bay area.
The House Democratic Caucus does not provide summaries of bills.
So, yes, we display the House Republican Conference’s summaries when available even if we do not have a Democratic summary available. That’s because we feel it is better to give you as much information as possible, even if we cannot provide every viewpoint.
We’ll be looking for a source of summaries from the other side in the meanwhile.
The bill contains the following citations to other parts of U.S. law:
The United States Code is the compilation of general and permanent laws enacted by Congress. Laws that are not permanent in nature, law that affect a single individual, family, or small group, regulations, case law, state law, and local law do not appear in the United States Code.