H.R. 3852 (111th): Chesapeake Clean Water and Ecosystem Restoration Act of 2009

Oct 20, 2009 (111th Congress, 2009–2010)
Died (Referred to Committee)
Elijah Cummings
Representative for Maryland's 7th congressional district
Read Text »
Last Updated
Oct 20, 2009
60 pages
Related Bills
S. 1816 (Related)
Chesapeake Clean Water and Ecosystem Restoration Act

Reported by Committee
Last Action: Jun 30, 2010


This bill was introduced on October 20, 2009, in a previous session of Congress, but was not enacted.

Introduced Oct 20, 2009
Referred to Committee Oct 20, 2009
Full Title

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to improve and reauthorize the Chesapeake Bay Program.


No summaries available.

Primary Source

THOMAS.gov (The Library of Congress)

GovTrack gets most information from THOMAS, which is updated generally one day after events occur. Activity since the last update may not be reflected here. Data comes via the congress project.


Get a bill status widget for your website »


Click a format for a citation suggestion:


H.R. stands for House of Representatives bill.

A bill must be passed by both the House and Senate in identical form and then be signed by the president to become law.

The bill’s title was written by its sponsor.

GovTrack’s Bill Summary

We don’t have a summary available yet.

Library of Congress Summary

The summary below was written by the Congressional Research Service, which is a nonpartisan division of the Library of Congress.

Chesapeake Clean Water and Ecosystem Restoration Act of 2009 - Amends the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (commonly known as the Clean Water Act) to:
(1) revise and expand definitions under the Chesapeake Bay Program;
(2) expand the implementation and monitoring grant programs; and
(3) require that at least 10% of funds for implementation grants be made available to the states of Delaware, New York, and West Virginia, and that at least 20% of such funds be made available to Chesapeake Bay States (i.e., Delaware, Maryland, New York, West Virginia, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and the District of Columbia) to provide technical assistance to agricultural producers and foresters.
Requires the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to:
(1) make public by March 31 of each year a Chesapeake Bay action plan to protect and restore the Chesapeake Bay;
(2) establish a Chesapeake Bay Stewardship Grants Program;
(3) establish minimum criteria for watershed implementation plans;
(4) establish by December 31, 2010, a Chesapeake Bay-wide TMDL (total maximum daily load for nitrogen, phosphorus, and sediment loading to the waters in the Chesapeake Bay);
(5) establish by May 12, 2012, an interstate nitrogen and phosphorus trading program for the Chesapeake Bay;
(6) designate the Asian oyster (species Crassostrea ariakensis) as a biological pollutant in the Chesapeake Bay; and
(7) conduct a study on the impacts of the commercial harvesting of Menhaden (species Brevoortia tyrannus) on Chesapeake Bay water quality.
Requires each Chesapeake Bay State to: (1) submit to the Administrator by May 12, 2011, a watershed implementation plan to be fully implemented by May 12, 2025; and (2) institute a ban on phosphorus cleaning agents within three years after the enactment of this Act.
Authorizes the Secretary of the Interior to provide funds to the states of Delaware, Maryland, and Virginia to carry out a program to eradicate or control nutria (species Myocaster coypus) and restore marshland destroyed by nutria.
Authorizes appropriations for FY2010-FY2015 for nonpoint source management programs (reduction of water pollution from land use practices).

House Republican Conference Summary

The summary below was written by the House Republican Conference, which is the caucus of Republicans in the House of Representatives.

No summary available.

House Democratic Caucus Summary

The House Democratic Caucus does not provide summaries of bills.

So, yes, we display the House Republican Conference’s summaries when available even if we do not have a Democratic summary available. That’s because we feel it is better to give you as much information as possible, even if we cannot provide every viewpoint.

We’ll be looking for a source of summaries from the other side in the meanwhile.

Use the comment space below for discussion of the merits of H.R. 3852 (111th) with other GovTrack users.
Your comments are not read by Congressional staff.

comments powered by Disqus